Accounts Receivables
1.
Revenue for FY2017 was $34,350 million.
2.
The net accounts receivables for Nike for the year ending on May 31, 2017 was $ 3,677 million.
The gross accounts receivables for Nike for the year ending on May 31, 2017 was $3,696 million
3.
The write off during the FY2017 for bad debts was $ 17 million while the actual bed debt expense at $ 13 million was smaller than that written off.
4.
The inventory as on May 31, 2017 was $ 5,055 million.
5.
Gross profit (FY2017) = $15,312 million
Revenue (FY2017) = $34,350 million
Gross profit margin = (15312/34350)*100 = 44.58%
The gross profit margin implies that 44.58% of the sales amount would be gross profit.
6.
In the given case, conversion would first need to be done into FIFO considering that Nike uses the FIFO method to measure costs.
COGS under FIFO = COGS under LIFO + Change in LIFO Reserve = 2259 + (518-422)= $ 2,355 million
Revenue = $3,963 million
Gross profit = 3963-2355 = $1,608 million
Gross profit (%) = (1608/3963)*100 = 40.58%
Clearly Nike’s gross margin is higher than the competitor.
7.
Total gross PPE as on May 31, 2017 = $7.958 million
Net PPE as on May 31, 2017 = $3.989 million
The difference between the two is attributed to accumulated depreciation.
8.
The balance sheet equation for the issue of bonds is indicated below
Assets (+$50 million) = Liabilities (+50 million) + Equity (No change)
There would be an increase in cash by $ 50 million owing to bonds which issued which lead to non-current liability for bonds payable to the same amount.
The balance sheet equation for the purchase of PPE is indicated below
Assets (No change) = Liabilities (No change) + Equity (No change)
The cash in the current asset is now used to buy PPE and hence indicated as fixed assets.
9.
The balance sheet equation for the issue of bonds one year later is indicated below
Assets (-$1 million) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (-$1 million)
There is an interest payment of $ 1 million (i.e. 2% of $ 50 million) resulting in cash reduction and this would reduce the net profit to the same extent and adversely impact the retained earnings.
The balance sheet equation for the purchase of PPE one year later is indicated below.
Assets (-$ 10 million) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (-$10 million)
Inventory
There is a depreciation to the tune of $ 10 million (50/5 =10 million) which would reduce the value of the fixed assets and this depreciation would lead to lower profits and lower increase in retained earnings.
10.
The balance sheet equation for the rental agreement on the decision date is indicated below
Assets (No effect) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (No effect)
Since the given transaction is an operating lease, hence asset would not be recognised in the balance sheet and corresponding no liability also recorded.
11.
The balance sheet equation for the rental agreement after one year from decision date is indicated below
Assets (-$10.06 million) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (-$10.06 million)
There is a rental payment of $ 10.06 million leading to reduction of cash and this would reduce the net profit to the same extent and adversely impact the retained earnings.
12.
Owing to the given transactions, it is apparent that there would be a decrease in the net income by $21.06 million owing to rental payment, interest payment and incremental depreciation. The same amount of decline would also be observed in the total assets. But since total assets are greater than net income, hence the % decrease in net income would be greater than the % decrease in total assets, leading to decline of ROA.
13.
Total net identifiable intangible assets for Nike as on May31, 2017 = $283 million.
These primarily constitute of trademarks and goodwill.
14.
The goodwill for the company as on May 31, 2017 is $139 million.
15.
There was no impairment in the goodwill as on May 31, 2017 as specified in Note 4 dealing with intangible assets and goodwill.
16.
The balance sheet equation for the decision to invest in R&D at the decision date is indicated below
Assets (No effect) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (No effect)
No asset would be created till any money is spent on R&D. Only decision has been taken to invest.
17.
The balance sheet equation for the decision to invest in R&D one year later is indicated below.
Assets (No effect) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (No effect)
$ 10 million would be decreased in cash and $ 10 million would be invested in fixed assets. Hence, no net effect on asset. Liabilities and equity remain un-impacted.
18.
The balance sheet equation for the decision to acquire the firm on the acquisition date is indicated below.
Gross Profit Margin
Assets (No effect) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (No effect)
$ 40 million would be decreased in cash but $ 32 million would be recorded as patent and $ 8 million as goodwill. Thus, assuming all payment in cash for the acquisition, there would be no net change in the total assets. Liabilities and equity remain un-impacted.
19.
The balance sheet equation for the decision to acquire the firm after one year from the acquisition date is indicated below.
Assets (-$9 million) = Liabilities (No effect) + Equity (-$ 9 million)
An impairment of $ 1 million is recorded for goodwill. Also, an impairment for patent to the extent of (32/4) = $ 8 million would be recorded. Hence, the fixed assets would decline by $ 9 million. This impairment charges would be reflected in the income statement and hence would impact retained earnings to the same extent.
20.
Option 1 where the spending is on R&D would result in higher income considering that the amortization liability does not exist which is not the case with the second option.
21.
As per DuPont decomposition, ROE can be computed as follows.
ROE = Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * Leverage
Profit Margin = (Net income/Sales) = (4240/34350) = 0.1234 or 12.34%
Asser Turnover = (Sales/Average Assets) = (34350/(23259+21379)/2) = 1.54
Leverage = (Average Assets/Average Equity) = ((23259+21379)/2)/((12407+12258)/2) =1.81
Hence, ROE = 12.34*1.54*1.81 = 34.38%
22.
The profit margin of Nike at 12.34% is significantly superior in comparison to the competitor which has a profit margin of only 5.85%. Additionally, the ROE for Nike is also comparatively much superior to the competitor. However, asset turnover is marginally lower in comparison to the competitor.
23.
Effective tax rate = Income tax expense/Profit before tax = (646/4886) = 13.22%
Clearly, this is significantly lower than the statutory rate of 35%. The factor which contributed to the largest difference between the effective and statutory tax rate is the foreign earnings which led to drop by about 20.7%.
24.
An example of accrued liabilities is in the form of dividends payable to the extent of $ 300 million for FY2017. The requisite balance sheet equation is as highlighted below.
Assets (+300 million) = Liabilities (+300 million) + Equity (No effect)
Owing to dividends not being paid, the cash would be higher by $ 300 million which would balance the liability increase by the same amount.
25.
Total dividends paid for FY2017 = $1,133 million
Share repurchases in FY2017 = $ 3,223 million
26.
The company has bought incremental marketable securities to the extent of $ 52 million in the year FY2017 which is apparent based on the comparison for the corresponding figure with value for FY2016.
27..
Demand creation expense for FY2017 = $ 3,341 million
28..
Cash flow from Operations (FY2017) = $3,640 million
Cash flow from Investment (FY2017) = -$1,008 million
Cash flow from Financing (FY2017) = -$1,942 million
The company seems to be in maturity phase owing to the cash flow from operations being significant. However, the company is still investing and raising cash which means that the company is not in the decline phase. Also, there is an increase in the net cash balance for FY2017 which does not happen in the growth phase.
