Simplification Of Activities For Queensland Health Payroll System Development Essay.

1. Differentiate methods of project negotiation, conflict management, and stakeholder engagement across projects consisting of differing technology standards and asset lifecycles.

2.  Explain and apply methods of identifying and reconciling inconsistent and conflicting objectives and drivers that develop, maintain, mange relationships and communication with key stakeholders.

The Queensland Health payroll system had been developed considering the implication of the effective project management processing. The management of the payroll for the development of the effective and improved operations would be helpful for easing the processing of the smart development process. The execution of the payroll system would be helpful for supporting the implication of the improved functional and development models.

The project characteristics of project 1 are based on the simplification of the activities for Turner and Cochrane Four Quadrant Perspective Theory.

The justifications for these characteristics are that the project would be based on the simplification of the activities with characteristics like product development, IT engineering, and product alignment. The payroll system development would be eased with the help of analysing the activities for easing the operation development.

The project characteristics of project 2 are based on the simplification of the activities for Organizational Learning Process.

The justifications for these characteristics are that the activities would be effectively implied for involving the improvement of the key operations with the help of organizational learning process for the governance of the project and effective decision making for Queensland Health Payroll system.  

The project characteristics of project 3 are based on the simplification of the activities for Learning Process Development.

The justifications for these characteristics are that it would allow the learning of the improved change implication and management of the people for being improved with the people and change.

The project characteristics of project 4 are based on the simplification of the activities for Identity Perspective.

The justifications for these characteristics are that the funding activities would play a significant role for developing the alignment of the effective process development for the Queensland Health Payroll Project. 

For Project 1 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.

The negotiating position of the owner will be considerably high as the owner would be in charge of stating the project approval.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the owner may have are change in unable to convey the requirements, change in requirements, and quality issues. 

The negotiating position of the designers will be relatively high as the payroll system development would require the designing of the system and its interface.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the designers may have are lack of information, design flaws, and incompatible design issues.

Negotiating Positions

The negotiating position of the contractors will be low as the contractor are external to the project and would not play much crucial role for re health payroll system.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the contractors may have are delay in providing services and payment issues.

For Project 2 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.

The negotiating position of the owner will be high as the owner would be responsible for the major decision making in the project.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the owner may have are unable to meet standards and unable to follow the orders.

The negotiating position of the designers will be low as the designer does not play a significant role in governance and decision making.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the designers may have are lack of the pre-information and process deviation.

The negotiating position of the contractors will be low as the contractor are external to the project and would not play much crucial role for re health payroll system.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the contractors may have are process obligation and development issues.

For Project 3 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.

The negotiating position of the owner will be high as the owner would be responsible for the alignment of the activities.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the owner may have are change issues and probable function issues.

The negotiating position of the designers will be low as the change and people management would not be responsibility of the designer.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the designers may have are design flaw and operational issues.

The negotiating position of the contractors will be low as the contractor are external to the project and would not play much crucial role for re health payroll system.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the contractors may have are payment and agreement issues.

For Project 4 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.

The negotiating position of the owner will be high as the funding of the project would be dependent on the owner’s agreed value.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the owner may have are lack of the probable execution management.

The negotiating position of the designers will be low as the designers do not play any role in the development of the funding scheme.

Conflicts in Relationships

The potential conflicts in relationships that the designers may have are plan execution issues.

The negotiating position of the contractors will be moderate as the payment of the contractor and its workers would impact on the funding requirements.

The potential conflicts in relationships that the contractors may have are probable payment issues and delay.  

For Project 1 the negotiating position recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of behavioural approach. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the behavioural approach forward strategy as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning forward strategy for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland.

For Project 2 the negotiating position recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of structural approach. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the structural approach governance and decision making as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning governance and decision making for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland.

For Project 3 the negotiating position recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of integrative approach. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the behavioural approach people and change as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning people and change for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland.

For Project 4 the negotiating position recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of behavioural approach. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the behavioural approach funding as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning funding for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland. 

For Project 1 the negotiating method recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of integrated negotiation. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the integrated negotiation forward strategy as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning forward strategy for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland.

For Project 2 the negotiating method recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of fixed pie negotiation. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the fixed pie negotiation governance and decision making as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning governance and decision making for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland.

Negotiating Positions Recommended

For Project 3 the negotiating method recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of staged negotiation. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the staged negotiation forward strategy as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning forward strategy for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland.

For Project 4 the negotiating method recommended should be dependent on the implication of the factors of integrative negotiation. The negotiation of the project of payroll strategy would be based on the integrative negotiation funding as the execution of the project would allow the management of the processes aligning funding for the completion of the project of ‘health payroll system for Queensland.

The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 1 is based on the strategy of framework agreements. The forward strategy would be effectively implied with the help of framework agreements for the execution of the project of Queensland Health Payroll system. It would allow the management of the successive and improved functional development. The project can be effectively implied for the management of the improved formation development utilization methods.

The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 2 is based on the strategy of management contracting. The governance and decision making would be effectively implied with the help of management contracting for the execution of the project of Queensland Health Payroll system. It would allow the management of the successive and improved functional development. The project can be effectively implied for the management of the improved formation development utilization methods.

The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 3 is based on the strategy of design and contract. The people and change would be effectively implied with the help of design and contract for the execution of the project of Queensland Health Payroll system. It would allow the management of the successive and improved functional development. The project can be effectively implied for the management of the improved formation development utilization methods.

The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 4 is based on the strategy of framework agreements. The people and change would be effectively implied with the help of framework agreements for the execution of the project of Queensland Health Payroll system. It would allow the management of the successive and improved functional development. The project can be effectively implied for the management of the improved formation development utilization methods. 

Binder, J., 2016. Global project management: communication, collaboration and management across borders. Routledge.

Fleming, Q.W. and Koppelman, J.M., 2016, December. Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.

Harrison, F. and Lock, D., 2017. Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.

Heagney, J., 2016. Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.

Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Kerzner, H., 2018. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John Wiley & Sons.

Larson, E.W., Gray, C.F., Danlin, U., Honig, B. and Bacarini, D., 2014. Project management: The managerial process (Vol. 6). Grandview Heights, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.

Lock, D., 2017. The essentials of project management. Routledge.

Marchewka, J.T., 2014. Information technology project management. John Wiley & Sons.

Meredith, J.R., Mantel, S.J., Shafer, S.M. and Sutton, M.M., 2014. Project management in practice. Wiley.

Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), pp.202-217.

Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H., 2017. Project management for engineering, business and technology. Routledge.

Turner, J.R., 2014. Handbook of project-based management(Vol. 92). New York, NY: McGraw-hill.

Turner, R., 2016. Gower handbook of project management. Routledge.

Verzuh, E., 2015. The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley & Sons.

Walker, A., 2015. Project management in construction. John Wiley & Sons.