L'oreal: Ethics, Policies, And An Ethical Issue With Product Testing On Animals - Essay.

Find an ethical issue relating to a company.How do they treat ethics? What are their policies?How did they actually deal with this issue?Recommendations.

Product Testing on Animals

L’oreal is a company of cosmetics dealing with different products of skincare, perfume, hair color, hair care, make-up and sun protection. The company has been dealing with beauty for over a hundred years. It has over thirty-four brands and makes sales worth 26.06b euros(Parr, 2018).It has got employees from all corners of the world. Being one of the leading beauty companies in the world has a chain distribution network to reach its customers worldwide. These networks are mass market, departmental stores, pharmacies and drug stores, hair salons, travel retail, branded retail and e-commerce (Parr, 2018). The company also has research and innovation departments in order to reach its beauty aspirations and also reach the commitment of sustainability by 2020. Its brands are Lancome, Biotherm, Cacharel, Ralph Lauren, Giorgio Armani, Shu Uemura, Kiehl’s, Yves Saint Laurent Beaute.

Product testing on animals; the company has been accused by PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) as one of the companies that still test their products with animals. This is because it failed to adopt a policy against animal test in ingredients and final products. Another reason for this claim is that L’oreal still sells its products to China which still deals with testing its cosmetic products on animals which are approved by law. For PETA, a company to be termed ‘cruelty- free’ must not conduct, commission pay, or allow animal tests on their ingredients and products anywhere in the world.(Daniel, Strickland, Allen, 2018). The chief marketing officer also noted that the brands should not wait for the business to start going down so as to start their innovations, but correct the mistakes they are encountering when it is still strong(Schreppler, Lu, Buchmann, Motzoi and Siddiqi, 2018). The company is now taking important steps to end product tests on animals. It has adapted to the policy of not to test ingredients or final products on animals. The company has generated a lot of resources in research and development of methods which can replace the archaic method of testing products on animals which are still used by some. It is using a lab-produced tissue to test the efficacy of ingredients and tolerance to products before they go to the market. This has reduced the use of live rabbits, mice and other laboratory animals in tests and experiments(Stephens et al.2011). The company is also advocating the Chinese government to end the test of cosmetics on animals(Holmes et al, 2017). However, the company has not been included in the list of cruelty- free by PETA since it is still selling its products to China. The government relaxed some of the company's provisions but still carries out tests on animals to some types of cosmetics. The company admitted that some of the cosmetics it sells to China are required by law to be tested(Devinney, 2009). It also pays the government to test its products on animals. PETA is urging the company to withdraw or refuse to sell its products to China as other companies have done until the Chinese market test on animals is no longer required by law.

L'oreal and Ethics

L’oreal and Ethics; the world's most ethical companies is based on Ethics Quotient (EQ)by the Ethisphere Institute. It has quantitative ways to assess the performance of a company in an objective, consistent and standardized manner. Information collected sets a comprehensive sampling of definitive criteria of key competencies. Scores are analyzedregarding; ethics compliance program, corporate citizenship, and responsibility, the culture of ethics, governance, and leadership, innovation and reputation(Devinney, 2009).When it comes to the code of ethics, the company has a "Constitution" that guides them. It inspires the choices, action and their everyday ethical principles on professionalism. This applies to all employees and subsidiaries internationally(Haski-Leventhal,Roza and Meijs, 2017). Each employee has access to the code of ethics either digitally or a printed copy on joining. The company was one of the first in France to come up with the code of ethics. It is available in different languages. These ethics cover its activities in research, innovation and design of the products from manufacturing to marketing, human resource to operations, administration and finance to sustainable developments, communication, public affairs to digital. On the side of digital transformation, the company needs specific expertise(Stephens et al.2011) and (Nghiem and Carrasco, 2016). That is marketing specialist, community manager and audience manager. Each member has a personal commitment to follow the code in letter and spirit. Key things the members have to remember is that the principles are not optional and they should respect them because they will be evaluated by not only what they do but also how they do it(Wickert, Vaccaro and Cornelissen,2017).

 The company has also been ranked as the leading NGO on environmental performance. It also has a high score in the fight against climate change, deforestation, and responsible water management. In promoting standards for business ethics, it is the most ethical company in the world and promotes gender equality(Schreppler, Lu, Buchmann, Motzoi and Siddiqi, 2018). L’oreal is managing its sustainability goals with the same entrepreneurial spirit and ambitious to its business goals(Schreppler, Lu, Buchmann, Motzoi and Siddiqi, 2018). The company has also set new goals for the future. The company notes that there are still major challenges ahead and is determined to overcome them. It is also keen on ensuring that its products are used more responsibly by the people who buy them.

L’oreal policies; the company has an approach which entails respecting all recognized international human rights. The international standards it must comply with are ILO Convections which focuses on forced labor, child labor, rights to freedom of association, nondiscrimination and collective bargaining. In circumstances where the local laws may contradict the international standards, it seeks to bring awareness of different jurisdictions(Stephens et al.2011). The company also favors partners who share their commitment to respect human rights which are known internationally and willing to end their ties with the business partners unwilling to do the same. It also supports the actions of the public on health regarding skin cancer with their initiative Active Cosmetics Division(Epstein, 2018).

L'oreal Policies

The company is also focused on addressing human rights with their value chain. To the consumers, it seeks to ensure that they choose the raw materials carefully with quality and safety(Nghiem and Carrasco, 2016). L’oreal also respects the rights of its employees according to therecognized international human rights. Their code of ethics covers the prohibition of forced labor, sexual harassment or bullying, prohibition of discrimination, prohibition of child labor and young workers, collective bargaining and respect for privacy and freedom of association. They also support their employee’s wellbeing. To the workers and suppliers the company requires them to practice transparency, remedy non- compliances and focus on continuous improvement. Workers and clients should also adopt a similar commitment(Nghiem, and Carrasco, 2016). They are also attentive to the rights of the women in their general Diversity policy. They recognize their contribution to the continuous of humankind(Sarason, Y.A., 2018).

Governance, due diligence, remediation, and reporting. This policy is regularly updated to reflect their continuous. The Vice president and Chief Ethics Officer oversee the implementationofthe human rights. There are grievance reporting mechanisms that employees use to report incidents of human rights abuse(Nghiem, and Carrasco, 2016). This calls for a course of action when necessary. It prevents the issue from recurring again and looks for a remedy to the individuals harmed. Commercial relations may also be broken in serious cases or fail to approve a new partner(Stephens et al., 2011.).

Conclusion:

Loreal being a booming cosmetics and beauty company for all generations is eying towards a bright future regarding product and customer satisfaction, research and technology. The company is also keen to improve the social profile by a hundred percent that the products that they put on the market require a radical paradigm change. Due to the challenge of product testing on an animal, they have been going through the company is keen on the initiative to rule it out completely with the progress in research they are making. They want the information accessible to all consumers so that they can make their own informed choices.The company notes that there are still major challenges ahead and is determined to overcome them. It is also keen on ensuring that its products are used more responsibly by the people who buy them.

References:

Daniel, A.B., Strickland, J., Allen, D., Casati, S., Zhuang, V., Barroso, J., Whelan, M., Régimbald-Kernel, M.J., Kojima, H., Nishikawa, A. and Park, H.K., 2018.International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.

Devinney, T.M., 2009. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility.

Epstein, M.J., 2018. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts.Routledge.

Fritsche, E., Crofton, K.M., Hernandez, A.F., Bennekou, S.H., Leist, M., Bal-Price, A., Reaves, E., Wilks, M.F., Terron, A., Sachana, M. and Gourmelon, A., 2017. OECD/EFSA workshop on developmental neurotoxicity (DNT): The use of non-animal test methods for regulatory purposes. ALTEX-Alternatives to animal experimentation, 34(2), pp.311-315.

Haski-Leventhal, D., Roza, L. and Meijs, L.C., 2017. Congruence in corporate social responsibility: Connecting the identity and behavior of employers and employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), pp.35-51.

Holmes, A.M., Charlton, A., Derby, B., Ewart, L., Scott, A. and Shu, W., 2017.Rising to the challenge: applying fabrication approaches for better drug and chemical product development. Biofabrication, 9(3), p.033001.

Stephens, M.L., Barrow, C., Andersen, M.E., Boekelheide, K., Carmichael, P.L., Holsapple, M.P. and Lafranconi, M., 2011.

Wickert, C., Vaccaro, A. and Cornelissen, J., 2017. “Buying” corporate social responsibility: organizational identity orientation as a determinant of practice adoption. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), pp.497-514.Galindo, D.W., 2018. Agenda Item Request.

Nghiem, T.P.L. and Carrasco, L.R., 2016. Mobile applications to link sustainable consumption with impacts on the environment and biodiversity. BioScience, 66(5), pp.384-392.

Parr, R.L., 2018. Intellectual property: valuation, exploitation, and infringement damages. John Wiley & Sons.

Sarason, Y.A., 2018. Social ventures: exploring entrepreneurial exit strategies with a structuration lens. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 5(1), pp.1-10.

Schreppler, S., Lu, M., Buchmann, L., Motzoi, F. and Siddiqi, I., 2018. Ion-Trap Inspired Entangling Gate for Superconducting Qubits. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.

Stephens, M.L., Barrow, C., Andersen, M.E., Boekelheide, K., Carmichael, P.L., Holsapple, M.P. and Lafranconi, M., 2011.Accelerating the development of 21st-century toxicology: outcome of a Human Toxicology Project Consortium workshop. Toxicological Sciences, 125(2), pp.327-334.