Smart Beta ESG Essay: Tips From Aberdeen Standard Investment.

The following three essay questions are based on an article of Aberdeen Standard Investment (ASI) published in 2018:

http://www.aberdeen-asset.de/static_files/documents/662f3bdd-62a0-4fbc-a266-793fdf5eea36/1/69274-cd-asi_1137_esg_smart-beta-white-paper_tcm.pdf

The background of ASI, including Aberdeen Asset Management and Standard Life Aberdeen, is available at:
https://www.aberdeenstandard.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberdeen_Asset_Management

1. The ASI article mentions that Smart-beta-ESG strategies would provide better investment performance. Do you agree to it? Why or why not?

2 . Suppose that you are interested in replicating this Smart-beta-ESG strategy. Please suggest how you construct a portfolio with identified securities (including funds) and their portfolio weights. These securities must be tradable in international stock exchanges (such as those in HK, USA, Europe, and Japan). Your solution should be supported by empirical evidence.

About Aberdeen Standard Investment (ASI)

Aberdeen Standard Investment (ASI) is devoted to assist investors for attaining their investment objective and widen their financial prospects regarding same. Further, these investments attempt to offer world-class investment knowledge around a breadth of markets as well as asset groups. Their full variety of solutions includes equities, multi-asset, fixed income, independent wealth funds, and property as well as private markets.  As the investment is  united with a variety of investment approaches, from quantitatively-controlled smart beta to extremely active alpha-seeking policies, they convert new investment proposal into realistic investment products created to deliver real significance for money to investors.

It has been observed in recent years that significance of smart beta and ESG has boosted up comparatively. It is anticipated that there will be a rise in growth in both the investment proposals. The connection between these two trends continues to acutely under-researched, mainly since these strategies are infrequent. Smart beta is known as a niche of a niche.  

Smart beta ESG is far from typical, as it is determined that there are more widespread than might be anticipated for a strategy presently referred to as a niche of a niche. The reason behind same is that less than one-quarter (24%) of the investors states they are operating smart beta ESG, which is defined as investment approaches which give exposure to the measure of smart beta as well as EGS . In addition to this, ESG metrics applied in this strategy utilised quantitative testing to add financial significance to conventional factor approaches. Furthermore, investors of this group refer to carbon, corporate environmental along with governance data. The success of strategy can be accessed from the statement of Europe that their work with smart beta ESG came off back of a two-year exploration project which determined how ESG can enhance the risk or return recital of their smart beta directory.

One of the main advantages offered by smart beta ESG is that with the assistance of its regulations-based procedure, smart beta provides clarity related to which ESG inputs are being utilised and enables for targeted ESG disclosures. The investors ascertain that ESG metrics are more perceptive than entire scores in an ESG incorporation context. Along with this, smart beta provides superior quality ESG data over time. The reason behind same is its qualitative focus.

                                Figure 1: Application of Smart Beta ESG strategy for investor decision

It is stated by some of the investors that they found intrinsic benefit with smart beta ESG as an ESG incorporation approach. At the same time, vigorous administration provides a superior platform for engagement as a result of more concerted portfolios. Furthermore, Active executives have more flexibility in comparison to smart beta to build up strategic portfolio alterations in regard to innovative ESG information for example pipeline bursts, goods recall, and bribery disgraces. In addition to this, Smart beta ESG is considered as a nascent investment approach, but considerable research is taking place behind the scenes.

It can be concluded from the above discussion that the statement provided in the article of ASI that Smart-beta-ESG offers better investment performance is correct. The same has been explained above through citing the merits which Smart Beta ESG provides.

The Advantages of Smart Beta ESG Strategies

Allocation of the asset is considered one of the most significant decision while creating a portfolio. The same implies that it is significant to ensure that the portfolio has a precise mix of asset harmonising with the person’s conditions, investment aims and outlook to risk. In order to allocate assets efficiently, qualified investors often seek out to merge assets that tend to execute well at diverse times. Through assisting the adviser can determine perfect asset allotment, can operate to redesign the investment over time in order that the company has the best opportunity of accomplishment of investment goals. Furthermore, investment is bifurcated various assets classes for example equities, real estate, cash and bonds. Moreover, these offer the fundamental building blocks for creating an investment portfolio.

After allocation of the asset, the next step is to have a decision on sub-asset allocation. The same implies that the manner in which money will be bifurcated among the sub-assets, or various types of asset in every asset class. Every asset class includes different sub-asset classes.  For instance, a sub-asset class in equities can comprise- big organisations, small firms, growth funds, income funds along with global equities. While the major assets classes are united, diversification is important when selecting sub-assets.  The same will make sure that the company has not taken risk profligately by focusing on a specific sub-asset class. Comprehending different sub-assets with various investment styles that can implement within sub-asset might assist to operate in an efficient manner with a financial adviser to create a well-diversified investment proposal.

The broad choice is available to the investor to involve active, index or both the types of fund in the portfolio. Passive funds are also known as index or tracker funds. It is suggested not to select individual securities.  Instead, they concentrate on reflecting the trends or changes taking place in the market.  Further, they operate through trying to track an index, for example, FTSE All-Share Index closely. Executives are appointed by active funds so that they can do research and choose equities or bonds with an expectation to beat the pertinent index or market average. At the same time, in reality, it is complex to exercise for a long period of time. Selecting an array of uncorrelated active and index funds with an attempt to decrease overall portfolio instability is possible.  

Once the type of funds is selected, the next step is to choose a fund executive who is reliable. It is to be considered that whether index or active executives is selected, there should be an enhancement in outperformance though concentrating on those with reduced fund costs since it is important to keep more of any return the funds attained. The finest manner to break down and assess fund executives is by considering the four Ps that are people, psychology, procedures and performance. If active controlled funds are chosen for investment than in that case, it is complex to foresee which executive will outperform the target.   

Investor area and size

Constructing a Portfolio with Identified Securities

There are key variations in smart beta adoption when it is accessed in terms of investor region and size. It has been analysed that  big investors are more potential than smaller to be invested in smart beta. Further, this is intuitive, since investor size is often perceived as a substitute for innovation capacity.              

For smart beta funds and mandates are considered as fundamental access points. Approximately, 48% of the investors access smart beta by funds, comprising devoted funds as well as co-mingled funds. On the other hand, 38% of the investors assert that they utilise segregated mandates. Rare investors utilised funds along with mandates, recommending that investor have clear choices for evaluating smart beta. Moreover, fund states that the access is through a hedge fund which takes into consideration, derivative involving swaps in order to execute smart beta approaches.

                       Figure 2: The extent to which company access Smart beta Strategy for specified securities.

The amount available for investment will be proportionate in below specified weight. Further securities which are chosen for the development of portfolio are traded at the International stock exchange. Details relating to securities and relating stock exchange have been provided below:

Above specified securities belong to a different industry, i.e. hospitality, technology, power etc. The concept of diversity has been appropriately followed while developing a portfolio in order to decrease the extent of the volatility of risk as well as return. Further, the same concept will also assist in attaining a minimum required rate of return. Moreover, through the application of ESG investor will be able to attain the investment objective which comprises growth as well as controlling volatility. Thus, through the application of a multifactor approach and quantitative investment strategy of Smart-beta- ESG the pre-determined investment objectives will be attained in a smooth manner.

There are three techniques of Smart-Beta-ESG that are negative screens, climate tilts and ESG metrics. The first is a comparatively straightforward method of expanding negative screens, for example, prohibits organisations which exclude companies operating with tobacco or contentious firearms, to smart beta approaches. This is typically attained by authorization, dedicated funds or internally administered portfolios. Few investors in this class assert that they concentrate their screens on a carbon-related method for examples carbon intensity contrast to its industry peers.  Further, negative screens account for approximately two-thirds of smart beta ESG instances.

The next approach is climate tilts in which investors merge ESG information, and smart beta approaches through the application of the specified approach. It is specified by one of the investors that the tilts regulate the final weight of organisation in a factor index based on a range of climate change-associated metrics, for example, carbon secretions and fossil fuel exposure. Climate tilts account for 8% of the smart beta ESG.

In addition to this, smart beta engages a sweet spot among active and conservative passive, in that it provides the latent of market outperformance but at a cost structure which is more closely allied to passive.  Smart beta enables the investor to add significance in a cost-efficient mannerthrough the same outlook is not yet accepted and shared at wide level. Along with this, smart beta provides several but not all of the advantages related to active administration. Some asset owners ascertain that with their active mandates, they are increasingly selecting extremely active, executives with a high alpha who utilises high certainty portfolios for instance hedge funds since they consider such are the kinds of approaches which are likely to provide enhanced returns.

                                       Figure 3: Factors used in the application of Smart Beta-ESG

Furthermore, just like there is an advancement in preeminent practices of aspect investing, there has been a development in the manner of consideration that ESG execution in the investment portfolio. ESG incorporation Version 1.0 comprises exclusionary broadcast based on spiritual beliefs or business and product involvement in alcohol, tobacco and weapons. Though, this strategy reduces the opportunity set as well as the exclusionary broadcasting does not enable investors to connect directly with organisations in order to alter administration practices for the enhancement. In addition to this, ESG incorporation Version 2.0 is related to an effort for creating innovate best practices utilising superior quality ESG data that is structured as well as unstructured and incorporate that information through taking into utilisation the latest portfolio construction methods, reweighting holding which is relied on best-in-class performance or internally specified materiality structures.

Amel-Zadeh, Amir, and George Serafeim. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey." Financial Analysts Journal 74.3 (2018): 1-17.

Amenc, Noël, et al. "Robustness of Smart Beta Strategies." The Journal of Index Investing 6.1 (2015): 17.

Fatemi, Ali, Martin Glaum, and Stefanie Kaiser. "ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure." Global Finance Journal (2017).

Giese, Guido, Arnfried Ossen, and Steven Bacon. "ESG as a Performance Factor for Smart Beta Indexes." The Journal of Index Investing 7.3 (2016): 7.

Guerard Jr, John B., ed. Portfolio Construction, Measurement, and Efficiency: Essays in Honor of Jack Treynor. Springer, 2016.

Halland, Håvard, et al. Strategic investment funds: opportunities and challenges. The World Bank, 2016.

How to Implement ESG in Smart Beta. ONLINE. Available through < https://www.ssga.com/products-strategies/how-to-implement-esg-in-smart-beta.html>. (2018). [Accessed on 29^th November 2018]

Jaeger, Lars, and Jeffrey Pease. Alternative beta strategies and hedge fund replication. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

Johnson, Deborah. "Smart beta is here to stay." Investment Magazine 140 (2017): 14.

Kula, Gökhan, Martin Raab, and Sebastian Stahn. Beyond smart beta: Index investment strategies for active portfolio management. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

Lee, Stefan Colza, and William Eid Junior. "Portfolio construction and risk management: theory versus practice." RAUSP Management Journal (2018).

Liagkouras, Konstantinos, and Konstantinos Metaxiotis. "Efficient portfolio construction with the use of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Best practices and performance metrics." International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 14.03 (2015): 535-564.

Luo, Yin, and Spyros Mesomeris. "Factor Investing and Portfolio Construction Techniques." Risk-Based and Factor Investing. 2016. 401-433.

Melas, Dimitris, Zoltan Nagy, and Padmakar Kulkarni. "Factor investing and ESG integration." Factor Investing. 2018. 389-413.

Portfolio construction A systematic approach to investing. PDF. Available through <https://www.vanguard.co.uk/documents/portal/literature/portfolio-construction-guide.pdf>. (2016) [Accessed on 29^th November 2018]

Song, Irene. New quantitative approaches to asset selection and portfolio construction. Columbia University, 2014.