Mental Health Nurses' Role In Addressing Psychotic Illnesses In Acute Psychiatric Essay.

Psychotic Illnesses in Acute Psychiatric Wards

Mental health nurses must address the safety, comfort, and care demands of people suffering from psychotic illnesses to increase their chances of feeling better while in acute psychiatric wards. A variety of mental diseases might involve psychotic episodes as a symptom. Although schizophrenia is frequently the first condition that immediately springs to mind when individuals consider psychosis, not all types of schizophrenia contain psychotic symptoms. Psychiatric nursing interventions are critical to the health and treatment of individuals with mental illnesses. These interventions are now a part of everyday nursing practice. Through hospitalization and modern psychiatric nursing practices, the language of safety has shaped the treatment of patients with mental illness. Confinement evolved out of safety concerns: societal shame and concern about public safety and benevolently paternalistic goals to keep persons from harming themselves.

In acute psychiatric wards, mental health experts aim to diagnose, treat, and offer intense care to patients to lessen psychotic symptoms and improve their health (Thornicroft & Tansella, 2012). Increasing evidence has been documented in research studies of the ability to prevent psychosis and reduce psychotic symptoms to enhance people's health through treatment and care in various care settings. Specialists have suggested that mental health nursing treatment be person-centered (Sebergsen et al., 2016). It means that care actions should be given within the nurse's interpersonal interaction with the person receiving care. It must be based on how the person receiving care understands their condition and requirements and what the nurse perceives as the individual's care need (Barker & Buchanan-Barker, 2010).

Sebergsen et al. (2016) argued that the primary responsibility of mental health nurses in acute psychiatric wards is to address the person's immediate demands for protection and well-being and their bodily and mental concerns while experiencing psychotic illness. It necessitates skilled mental health nurses with specialized knowledge and abilities in mental health care for the individual, social interaction, and communication. Psychosocial engagement between the nurse and the individual receiving treatment is a pillar of mental health care (Cleary et al., 2012). It is critical to recognize that efficiency expectations in acute mental wards may prohibit nurses from connecting with patients (Björkdahl et al., 2010). To gain a better understanding of how people with psychosis experience and describe the mental health care they receive in acute psychiatric wards to help them feel better, we reviewed the literature on how people with psychosis experience and characterize the mental health care they receive in acute psychiatric wards to help them feel better (Sebergsen et al., 2016). It is the role of mental health nurses to assist and support people who are suffering from the psychotic disease to get moving again and feel better. The purpose of mental health nurses' care is feasible for individual respect.

When community mental health treatment is insufficient, mental health care is provided in acute psychiatric wards of hospitals to those undergoing sensitive periods of the psychotic disease. This investigation took place in four acute mental units at two general hospitals. Mid-sized city hospitals are responsible for delivering critical mental health care to vast geographical areas, implying somewhat substantial distances between the hospitals and the admitted patients' residences. Many bedwards provide short-term therapy and care to women and men with severe mental illness. The nursing team consists of mental health nurses, nursing assistants, and registered nurses who have received education and training in acute mental health care. The multi-professional team on the ward works with the people in care and, in many cases, the people in care's family members to build a mental health treatment plan for each person in care.

Person-Centered Care in Mental Health Nursing

Psychosis is a symptom complex characterized by hallucinations, delusions, mental abnormalities, and disordered utterance or conduct. Acute psychosis is classified as fundamental if it results from a mental problem or sequel from a specific physical condition. Auditory hallucinations, substantial cognitive abnormalities, and sophisticated delusions are common in patients with primary mental illnesses (Miller & Druss, 2013). If a medical condition causes the patient's psychosis, they may experience cognitive abnormalities, abnormal vital signs, and visual hallucinations. The most prevalent medical cause of acute psychosis is illicit drug usage. Health professionals should inquire about previous head trauma or damage, seizures, cerebrovascular illness, or fresh or severe headaches.

Subacute development of psychosis should raise the possibility of an oncologic aetiology. Collateral information from close relatives helps determine the illness's appearance and progress. Comprehensive neurologic and mental state assessments should be included in the physical examination. Tachycardia or severe hypertension might indicate drug poisoning or thyrotoxicosis, whereas fever could indicate encephalitis or porphyria. A complete blood count, metabolic profile, thyroid function tests, urine toxicology, parathyroid hormone measurements, calcium, vitamin B12, folate, and niacin are all recommended for first laboratory studies. Human immunodeficiency virus (H.I.V.) and syphilis testing should also be explored: Recognition of the cause of psychosis as soon as possible may enhance therapy, consultation, and prognosis.

Acute psychosis is classified as primary if it results from a mental problem or secondary from a specific physical condition. A critical diagnostic difference must be established between psychotic symptoms induced by delirium, a mental illness, and a particular medical ailment. For example, distinguishing delirium from psychosis may be challenging if substance abuse or withdrawal is suspected. According to American Psychiatric Association (2013), agitation, a frequently reversible or transitory condition of confusion caused by abnormal brain activity, is most commonly recognized in elderly or institutionalized individuals. Still, it must be cleared out before a firm diagnosis of psychosis can be made. Patients who already have cognitive abnormalities may arrive with mixed delirium and psychosis. In these circumstances, it is beneficial to inquire about the duration of their symptoms, evidence of systemic illness, or recent environmental change and acquire collateral information from caregivers. These individuals may be taking several drugs that have psychotropic effects.

Throughout history and cultures, psychosis has been recognized as an aberrant state in need of treatment. Current psychotic disorder categories continue to be focused on the existence of distinct psychotic symptoms concerning affective and other signs and their sequence and duration (Lawrie et al., 2016). Although existing diagnostic categories have limited validity, they have established dependability and benefit most doctors and specific patients. Furthermore, nothing better has yet to replace these categories.

According to Choudry and Farooq (2018), the International Classification of Diseases (I.C.D.) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (D.S.M.), the two primary classification systems, have lately been updated. The American Psychiatric Association has completed the modification of DSM-IV, and DSM-5 has already reached. The draft ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for mental diseases are virtually finished and will be released as ICD-11 soon (Choudry & Farooq, 2018). This article will address the difficulties in categorizing psychotic illnesses and the new categorization of these diseases in ICD-11, and how it differs from ICD-10 and DSM-5. Several improvements to the categorization of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders have been made to improve the diagnostic classification's reliability, clinical use, and validity, which are discussed below.

Challenges in Mental Health Nursing in Acute Psychiatric Wards

There are several difficulties in identifying mental diseases, and defining psychosis embodies these difficulties. The essential category of schizophrenia's terminology is not widely accepted. Schizophrenia has already been dubbed "integration disorder" in the Japanese classification (Sugiura et al., 2001). The Japanese name for "schizophrenia" is "Seishin-bunretsu-byo," which translates as "mind-split-disease." The new word to replace schizophrenia, "Togo shitchosho," which means "integration disorder," is deemed more favourable for users and caregivers. It remains to be seen if altering the name of a diagnostic concept would influence stigma, but it underlines the difficulties inherent in categorizing psychiatric diseases.

Psychiatric diseases are symptom cluster categories. Isolated symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and psychosis reveal a significant overlap amongst diseases (12). Some of these isolated symptoms are well-known natural adaption processes in a given environment. Anxiety, for instance, is a constructive response when there is danger, and depression may be beneficial while recovering from the death of a loved one or a physical disease. When these symptoms become uncontrollable, they are referred to as "disorders." It might explain why these "psychiatric genes" haven't been wiped out by natural selection. From an evolutionary viewpoint, removing genes involved with these defensive systems would be detrimental.  Lives or bodies are in peril if we do not run when there is a threat or if we do not "down-regulate" in depression after significant physical or mental stress. The degree to which people are sensitive to their surroundings may vary, for better or for ill 8

Theories on the evolutionary persistence of psychosis

According to Shoesmith (2011), Darwinian psychosis hypotheses proposed a 'costly by-product' evolutionary model. An adaptive neurobiological mechanism that promotes fitness in the overwhelming majority of the population generates errors in a tiny minority, eventually leading to psychosis. The dysregulation occurs in the language centres via the social brain's frontotemporal and frontoparietal cortical connections (Shoesmith, 2011). Several proposals for resolving mental diseases' "evolutionary riddle" have been outlined, but they have also been challenged for more information (van Dongen & Boomsma, 2013). First, there might be a mismatch between our brain and contemporary culture, comparable to the ability to store energy in fat to survive in times of scarcity. In today's Western hemisphere can lead to obesity due to food abundance. However, psychotic diseases occur in more traditional or pre-modern civilizations and are just as maladaptive, making the mismatch theory less plausible. Second, there may be trade-offs with net advantages despite high costs, often known as balanced selection. For example, the growth of creativity may come at the expense of mental vulnerability. This balancing selection theory is also unlikely because acquiring alternative adaptive qualities that offset the "costs" of favourable features would logically be preferred during human development.

Scheepers et al. (2018) stated that a third hypothesis is polygenetic mutation-selection, which implies that ongoing new mutations in genes that have fitness-reducing effects on brain function play a significant role in complex mental diseases: This might be the best explanation for mental diseases associated with chromosomal abnormalities, a substantial reproductive disadvantage, and an increased risk with increasing parental age (Scheepers et al., 2018). Many individually rare and evolutionarily recent genetic variations are said to decrease mental health, which can contribute to illnesses such as schizophrenia. Even though these de novo mutations will be pruned out of the genetic pool, the typical person harbours over 500 distinct gene variants that may have fitness-reducing impacts on the brain functioning and, as a result, contribute to a continual distribution of vulnerability. However, Srinivasan et al. (2016) claimed that this third theory contradicts the findings showing the polygenetic overlap between schizophrenia and genetic fingerprints of very early human evolution.

Recognizing the Cause of Psychosis

However, schizophrenia is a complicated collection of symptoms. Psychotic, cognitive, and negative symptoms might all be the outcome of various evolutionary paths. Perhaps genes related to psychotic symptoms have been in the gene pool for a long time and are thus deemed normal (Scheepers et al., 2018). Still, other genes associated with cognitive susceptibility are constantly changing due to polygenetic mutation. -selection. In other words, psychotic symptoms may be a long-standing healthy feature in humans for a specific evolutionary cause. In contrast, diminished mental ability with cognitive decline may result from numerous separate mutations across time (Scheepers et al., 2018). At the core, schizophrenia may be better seen as a specific mental illness than a "psychotic condition" produced by a broad spectrum of genes that leave the brain sensitive or less adaptable to the environment (van Dongen & Boomsma, 2013): This leads to a fourth hypothesis: isolated psychotic symptoms should be a valuable survival strategy in a specific situation (Beck & Bredemeier, 2016). This adaptive mechanism becomes dysfunctional only when underlying brain susceptibility leads to a lack of control of this process. The differential susceptibility theory argues that this underlying brain vulnerability may not be a fixed given but rather depends on the environment.

According to Allen et al. (2014), globally, risk factors for developing and advancing mental diseases, such as psychosocial stress, poverty, loneliness, psychoactive substance use, and violence, are rising. As a result, there is an increasing need for treatment services to achieve and maintain good mental health following the current Sustainable Development Goals (S.D.G.s) (Buse & Hawkes, 2015). Globally, mental health care systems are structured to meet the emotional and psychological requirements of individuals suffering from mental illnesses. As a result, they are intended to provide holistic preventive, treatment, and rehabilitation mental health services that are inexpensive, accessible, and of high quality to attract and retain clientele (Kilbourne et al., 2018). Patients who are happy with their treatment in mental health facilities are more likely to follow health recommendations, return for follow-up visits, and use available health resources (Hawke et al., 2019). Gender, degree of education, work position, income level, duration of sickness, and duration of hospitalization are sociodemographic characteristics related to patient satisfaction (Allen et al., 2014). Other variables include the hospital atmosphere, waiting time, feedback system, communication skills of health care practitioners, and nursing care quality.

Gabrielsson et al. (2020) argued that the psychiatric and mental health nursing profession substantially influences the health and rehabilitation of service users. Whenever it comes to establishing and managing the company and delivering health care, psychiatric and mental health nursing research and theory make significant contributions (Gabrielsson et al., 2020). The study of psychiatric and mental health nursing has a considerable influence on how nursing students understand themselves, their roles and duties, their practice, and the people they encounter who are suffering from mental health disorders. The current healthcare system is frequently divided into somatic and psychological treatment (Happell et al., 2012). Individuals with decreased capacity to articulate their demands are in danger of falling outside of everyone's responsibilities and receiving isolated treatments for various symptoms, even though most health difficulties stem from the complexity of their complete living circumstances (Jormfeldt et al., 2018). Even if there are some discrepancies in mental health among European nations, most nations follow a conventional understanding of health as the absence of symptoms rather than having and maintaining the ability to live a decent life regardless of symptoms (Keogh et al., 2017). The comprehensive and inseparable aspect of health is frequently overlooked.

Differentiating Psychotic Symptoms from Delirium in Elderly Individuals

Moreover, the profession of modern psychiatric nursing has been evolving, particularly in acute care settings. Trauma-informed and community-based care have been prioritized. The psychiatric nurse's duty has traditionally been focused on assisting with mental health recovery and rehabilitation. Holistic health care, self-awareness (Scheick, 2011), therapeutic partnerships, mental health recovery, acute care psychiatry, trauma-informed care (Muskett, 2014), narrative and presence (Delaney, 2012), and mindfulness were all integral parts of psychiatric nursing.

Besides, psychiatric nurses share components of their personalities to give treatment (Sant & Patterson, 2013). The therapeutic use of self has been used to deliver nursing care. Self-awareness has been a dynamic, transforming process of becoming acquainted with oneself. Self-awareness entailed using insight and presence to direct proper nursing care. The quality of care offered by psychiatric nurses was significantly connected to their capacity to demonstrate empathy and successfully listen to others while keeping their sense of self-awareness in these encounters. Self-awareness has frequently been cited as a critical factor in forming therapeutic alliances. Self-awareness was positively associated with a nurse's use of empathy and the formation of therapeutic connections.

The desire to help others has led psychiatric nurses to participate in therapeutic interactions. The interpersonal relationship between mental nurses and their patients has always been at the heart of psychiatric nursing (Sant & Patterson, 2013). The therapy relationship's goal has been to assist the client in increasing their capacities to attain better health results. The ability to convey an empathetic attitude, provide individualized approaches to care, promote dignity, be present, match interventions to client needs, offer information and education, and maintain a less restrictive approach were critical elements in developing a therapeutic relationship. Nonjudgmental acceptance and receptivity to the expertise in developing a therapeutic connection were recognized as abilities to strengthen a therapeutic alliance (Razzaque, 2015).

Patients in intense distress frequently suffer connection fragmentation, including relationship fragmentation with oneself. Nurses aided clients in comprehending their health and distress experiences within the context of a therapeutic relationship. The active participation of attentive and supportive nurses aided in forming a therapeutic connection (Thibeault et al., 2010). Therapeutic interactions provided the foundation for more organized and complicated treatments based on a knowledge of the roles and identities of psychiatric nurses (Browne, 2014). The therapeutic connection has proven critical in providing client-centred treatment and mental health rehabilitation.

Interestingly, recovery has had a significant impact on mental health policy and psychiatric nursing practice (Barker & Buchanan-Barker, 2011). Recovery has been defined as a process that helps people live meaningful lives by providing them with the necessary personal, interpersonal, and societal resources. Clients with mental illnesses have played significant roles in their care under the recovery model, and mental health services have grown to be client-driven (Caldwell et al., 2010). Psychiatric rehabilitative therapies have been utilized to assist people living with mental diseases in developing skills that would allow them to live, study, socialize and work more freely and efficiently. Plans and interventions for rehabilitation offered a road map for recovery.

Moreover, the rehabilitation process has been centred on client self-management via developing strengths and accepting limits. Clients actively participated in interventions consistent with the recovery paradigm, such as homework assignments, modelling, journaling, and reality-testing activities. Awareness of triggers, coping methods, participation with others, and self-medication measures should be included in relapse prevention and planning (Caldwell et al., 2010). Although these ideas and techniques have been established inside psychiatric acute care facilities, the recovery process is frequently connected with community-based treatment.

The Importance of Collateral Information in Diagnosis

The cornerstone of psychiatric nursing has always been providing effective treatment in crucial conditions. Clients' health care demands might be unanticipated, resulting in an urgent, emergent, or crisis scenario. An acute care unit's objective has been to provide short-term hospital admission for mental examination, treatment, and care. Acute care has been mandated to offer systematic assessment and short-term intensive care to those unable to be treated in the community. The major goal of hospitalization has frequently been to stabilize emotions through nursing care and support.

Acute mental illness or deteriorating symptomology was frequently present in clinical circumstances culminating in hospitalization. Furthermore, chronic diseases that do not respond to therapy. A sign that a person was a threat to themself or others. The requirement for regular surveillance and the client's domicile is not favourable to healing. Furthermore, there is necessary to create therapeutic interactions with healthcare providers to stabilize a crisis. And medical care, as well as respite for community caregivers.

Psychiatric nurses who operate in settings with significant client turnover are frequently subjected to various unexpected situations. Regarding sickness and behaviour, the care demands of persons admitted to acute care units had grown increasingly complicated and demanding. Acute care facilities' increased acuity levels and a lack of attention to milieu may contribute to the usage of stringent and repressive procedures in these units (Thibeault et al., 2010). Clients have reported that routine practices like ward rules, ward rounds, search procedures, closed doors, and isolation and restraint are retraumatizing, emotionally uncomfortable, and disempowering (Muskett, 2014). Acute care psychiatric nursing has been in upheaval, shifting toward trauma-informed treatment.

The profession of psychiatric nursing in acute care settings has been evolving. Recovery-oriented frameworks and trauma-informed treatment were used in mental health services (Muskett, 2014). Client treatment has transferred from acute care to community settings. The move to community health services resulted in higher patient acuity in inpatient facilities, shorter lengths of stay, an emphasis on crisis stabilization and referral, and altered patient expectations of services in acute care settings. Changes in mental health services have created uncertainty in psychiatric nursing duties, particularly in the acute care environment. Energy exhaustion results from contact with clients enduring emotional distress, a lack of limitations, and ineffective coping (Sant & Patterson, 2013). Self-awareness and self-protection techniques have been proposed to safeguard nurses' health against burnout.

Acute care Psychiatric nurses operate in increasingly complicated workplaces with numerous goals and new expectations. Administrative and organizational obligations, as well as management of staffing difficulties and heavy workloads, were among the demands imposed on nurses. Because of these challenges, many nurses were obliged to practice in the 'here and now,' with little time to prepare carefully. Clients were generally happy with mental health services and therapy connections. Still, they were unsatisfied with over-reliance on medicine, compulsion, emphasizing medical power, and a lack of autonomy (Browne et al., 2014). Because the present knowledge base was insufficient and change in mental health services and psychiatric nursing continued, research into psychiatric nursing knowledge, practice, and interventions was recommended, particularly in acute care mental health settings.

Drug-Induced Psychosis

With developments in mental health treatment, the profession of psychiatric nursing has adapted and changed. Hermeneutic phenomenology has proved effective in investigating contextual aspects of experiences that directly apply in practice. In this setting, safety is not only a factor or aim but the ultimate priority in inpatient nursing care (Slemon et al., 2017). The phenomenology method acquires better knowledge about mental nursing treatments provided by psychiatric nurses to adult patients in acute care settings. Increased awareness may impact acute care psychiatric nurses' ability to deliver holistic treatment to manage this profession's changes and difficult demands. Reflection on results and knowledge translation have consequences for practice, policy, teaching, and research in mental health care and service delivery inside and beyond psychiatric nursing practice.

The existence of psychotic symptoms does not always indicate the presence of a psychotic disease. A mental health expert will conduct a complete medical and psychological examination over time to identify a psychotic condition: This can be done at home or in the hospital. First, they will look for psychosis caused by medicines or other disorders. A comprehensive strategy for maintaining mental health is necessary. Physical and mental health are closely intertwined, and seeing them as different things damages a person's total well-being. There is compelling evidence that a long-term mental health disorder can be a substantial risk factor for the development of physical illness. On the other hand, long-term physical health problems might contribute to poor mental health.

As a newly certified nurse, I frequently get overwhelmed by the demands of the workplace and struggle to adjust to their new roles in healthcare. During the transition time, I need changes to improve both competence and confidence in their capacity to practice autonomously. During the transition period, as a newly qualified mental health, I was filled with dread, especially when I perceived mental healthcare patients as dangerous and the working environment as dangerous, with little regard for my safety—accepting responsibility, facing challenges, and making changes assist me as a nurse in the mental health sector to develop confidence as a mental healthcare practitioner.

Notably, during the transition time, newly trained nurses are vulnerable and require opportunities to acquire competence and confidence in their capacity to practice autonomously. During the transition phase, newly trained nurses make judgments about whether or not they want to commit to their profession. They may opt to change jobs if they have difficulty adjusting to a demanding work environment (Hasan & Tumah, 2018). It is an expensive exercise for health care companies that spend time and money on fresh graduates only to have them depart the nursing profession after a short time.

Fear is related to the mental healthcare environment. This subject represents the terror felt by freshly certified nurses when confronted with the realities of the mental healthcare setting. The majority of participants reported feeling apprehensive and anxious, which they linked to aggressive and unpredictable patient behaviour. The stories recounted by other staff members heightened the dread of hostile patients. Tsai and Wu (2010), bad work environments are associated with several negative and costly consequences, including job unhappiness, career discontent, absenteeism, lower productivity, high turnover, emotional tiredness, and poor care quality. Rapid turnover of nursing staff limits the healthcare team's capacity to provide quality care (Flinkman & Salanter, 2015). Because of the high turnover of nursing personnel in the first few years of employment, there is a constant interest in establishing favourable working circumstances for newly-qualified nurses to encourage retention and reduce nursing shortages. The two literature analyses (Hooper et al., 2016) that focused on the opinions of newly-qualified nurses who migrated to mental health institutions emphasized the global challenge of attracting and keeping professional nurses in mental health facilities. Both assessments emphasized the need to investigate how newly-qualified nurses encounter the reality of clinical practice when they enter the psychiatric field.

Some drugs, such as antipsychotics, aid in the restoration of the brain's natural chemical equilibrium. Antipsychotic drugs are generally used to treat schizophrenia and other psychotic illnesses, delusional disorder, and bipolar affective disorder (Lally & MacCabe, 2015). They have typically been classified as either first-generation antipsychotics or second-generation antipsychotics. Most antipsychotics have the pharmacologic feature of antagonizing dopamine receptors in the brain. It leads to the theory that schizophrenia is caused by dopaminergic circuit dysfunction. Excess dopaminergic signalling in the mesolimbic route causes positive psychotic symptoms, whereas reduced dopaminergic signalling in the mesocortical route causes depression (Lally & MacCabe, 2015). The effectiveness of D2 receptor antagonists lends support to the dopamine idea. Furthermore, D2 agonists such as amphetamine have been linked to the onset of psychosis (Lally & MacCabe, 2015), whereas dopamine-depleting drugs such as reserpine have been linked to relieving psychotic symptoms.

In the presence of delirium, drug- or medication-induced psychotic illness is distinguished by hallucinations and delusions caused by the direct effects or withdrawal from a substance. In emergency rooms and crisis centres, episodes of substance-induced psychosis are widespread. To be classified as substance-induced psychosis, the hallucinations and delusions must be more severe than those associated with basic substance intoxication or withdrawal. The patient may also be drunk or detoxing. Symptoms are frequently brief and resolve immediately after the causal substance is removed. However, psychosis caused by amphetamines, cocaine, or P.C.P. can last for weeks because some young individuals with prodromal or early-stage schizophrenia use drugs that might cause psychosis. A comprehensive history is required before determining that acute psychosis is caused by substance use.

Exposure to hallucinogens or some prescription drugs can result in psychosis. Even while taking prescription medicines carefully, particularly sensitive persons might develop psychosis as a side effect in rare circumstances. When psychotic symptoms arise while using prescription drugs, the individual or a loved one should seek emergency medical attention. It may be important to discontinue the medicine immediately. Whenever these drugs are misused, the risk of psychosis increases. When it comes to nonprescription intoxicants, the danger of psychotic symptoms developing and how they present changes from one medication to the next. Taking a large dosage of cocaine at once, for example, can cause psychosis within minutes. In cocaine or amphetamine psychosis, persecutory delusions are prevalent.

Normally, hallucinogens can produce visual, aural, and tactile hallucinations, but this is not similar to psychosis. However, a poor response to this type of medicine or taking too much might create delusions and psychosis. It can occur with hallucinogens such as L.S.D. and psychotropic mushrooms, but psychosis can also develop with cannabis addiction, particularly when a significant quantity is used. Alcohol addiction can result in psychosis, but only after days or weeks of heavy usage. People who have a long history of alcohol misuse are more likely to have acute paranoia and hallucinations. Therefore, the obvious remedy for drug-induced psychosis is to quit taking any substance; however, the reality is sometimes more challenging. Addiction may make quitting difficult, and withdrawal symptoms are almost predictable following long-term substance consumption. Symptoms of mental illness might become severe to the point that people self-medicate, or a loss of impulse control can undermine any commitment to abstain.

Because of brain chemistry's enormous and well-documented effect on psychotic illnesses, initiating a pharmaceutical regimen is frequently the initial step in therapy. The appropriate drugs can interrupt or modify brain mechanisms that produce or worsen psychotic symptoms after commencing treatment. Various persons fully remission positive symptoms of many psychotic diseases, including hallucinations and delusions. Antipsychotic medicines are the most commonly used treatments for psychotic illnesses. Almost the majority of them function by inhibiting dopamine, which studies have shown to be hyperactive in the brains of persons suffering from psychotic illnesses. First-generation antipsychotics were created in the 1950s and are useful in treating psychotic symptoms. Nevertheless, they are less widely utilized because of significant side effects such as tardive dyskinesia and other motor difficulties.

In treating psychotic diseases, antidepressant drugs are frequently used with antipsychotic medications. They are frequently used to treat refractory symptoms in schizophrenia, particularly negative and mood symptoms such as flat affect and anhedonia. According to a 2015 research, at least 25% of persons with schizophrenia had comorbid depression. When coupled with antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants not only ease depressive symptoms but also successfully diminish negative symptoms of schizophrenia, according to research. Antidepressants have been demonstrated to be beneficial when used with antipsychotics.

People built positive relationships with various providers who helped them maintain and enhance their mental health in the community throughout time. People dealt with this in various ways, including being able to talk to an expert psychiatrist about their problems, adopting a radical approach to mental health that supported their interpretation of their experiences, and simply going for walks with a member of the mental health team. People respected specialists who took the time to interact with them, took them seriously, and displayed concern. Ongoing assistance may be required to assist a person who has psychosis living freely in the community. Assistance may include finding suitable employment and developing social and personal skills.

Castillo et al. (2019) reflected on Communities That Care (C.T.C.), a community-based preventive planning and implementation strategy that avoids teenage drug use, violence, delinquency, depression, suicide, and other mental health problems. The C.T.C. system is divided into five stages: identification of community stakeholders, the building of a community coalition, implementation of the C.T.C. system, and evaluation of the C.T.C. system (Castillo et al., 2019). In addition, a community profile will be developed to identify risk and protective variables associated with juvenile health and behaviour problems and a community action plan, implementation, and assessment.

Community Interventions' Activities by Social-Ecological Level. It stresses the effectiveness and promise of these interventions in boosting mental health and other results at all social-ecological levels. Individual, interpersonal family, corporate community, and policy are examples (Castillo et al., 2019). Individuals, communities, locations, leaders, and multi-sector coalitions all play distinct roles in the community. Many studies investigated the interactions between mental health services, social and structural determinants, and mental health outcomes. Some specifically examined social outcomes such as intimate partner violence, housing retention, academic performance, parent-child interactions, societal healing, and other aspects influencing mental and social well-being.

Application of Assertive Community Treatment (A.C.T.). A.C.T. stresses teamwork and team accountability, with the crucial relationship between the team and the client group rather than between individual team members and specific clients. Adamou (2005) argued that A.C.T. regularly outperforms conventional care and case management in inpatient care costs, even though data for hospital-based rehabilitation is sparse. A.C.T. is frequently, but not always, better than routine treatment and case management. The scant evidence provided for hospital-based rehabilitation favoured case management. However, when just inpatient expenses are examined, A.C.T. appears to be less expensive than other forms of care; however, this cost advantage is diminished when total healthcare costs are evaluated because total healthcare costs include the direct treatment costs of administering A.C.T. (Adamou, 2005). This trend shows that A.C.T. is a costly treatment. Its cost advantage over other care is contingent on achieving a significant relative reduction in inpatient hospitalizations. As a result, the A.C.T. is most likely to save money when applied to groups already heavy consumers of inpatient care (Adamou, 2005). The A.C.T. service design should focus on this patient demographic.

These therapies target teaching stress-coping skills and practices, enhancing the quality of life, and assisting people in managing their symptoms. The mental ward is a complicated environment. It is partly due to the magnitude of the patients' pain: They frequently arrive with psychosis, self-harm, drug misuse, and suicidality. They frequently arrive with a mix of these symptoms. As a result, providing appropriate therapy is a difficult endeavour. Part of the ward's intricacy stems from the characteristics of the setting itself (Tyrberg, 2019). Admissions and discharges are frequently quick and unexpected, staff members are required to handle a variety of demanding behaviours, have high levels of burnout and discontent at work, and the wards are frequently manned by bank personnel, resulting in a lack of continuity of treatment.

According to Tyrberg (2019), A.C.T. tries to provide the choice of doing what counts in life, even in an unpleasant experience. The key to this approach is recognizing that striving to exert control over ideas and feelings is a hopeless undertaking. Instead, it encourages a readiness to accept emotions and opinions as they are. In this regard, A.C.T. varies from standard exposure therapy (Tyrberg, 2019). It seeks to promote psychological flexibility, which is described as the ability to address the present moment more completely as a fully functioning human being, and alter or persevere in behaviour when doing so achieves valued purposes.

According to Wood et al. (2019), psychiatric inpatient treatment has altered considerably during the previous two decades due to a major drop in inpatient beds and an increase in mandatory detention. As a result, mental institutions frequently care for persons experiencing highly complicated acute issues, with just an average of three weeks to give care and promote recovery. Psychological interventions for psychosis, such as cognitive-behavioural therapy (C.B.T.), might begin early (Wood et al., 2019). There is substantial evidence that psychological therapy for psychosis is successful in inpatient and outpatient settings, with effect sizes equivalent to medical interventions (Wood et al., 2019). A recent comprehensive assessment of the evidence base found that psychological interventions are beneficial in lowering overall symptoms, depression, and functioning in inpatients experiencing psychosis. However, only a few psychological therapies have been modified to be provided in the current mental inpatient setting (Jacobsen et al., 2018). In other words, no short treatment package has been developed within the 3-week inpatient treatment window. Given the context of forced treatment, immediate hospitalization, detailed presentation, and danger, it is necessary to investigate what changes are required to offer psychological treatments to the psychotic population inside the acute psychiatric inpatient environment.

Paterson et al. (2018), the efficiency of psychological treatment may also be influenced by the acute ward setting, which is not always seen as therapeutic, safe, or favourable to emotional disclosure by patients or staff. Some recommendations even urge that patients be released before beginning therapy. Establishing the efficacy of therapy for patients in this type of inpatient care has become very crucial (Paterson et al., 2018). Furthermore, given the growing patient, caregiver, and provider need for this treatment to be provided. Acknowledge that services must do more to enhance patients' experience obtaining inpatient psychiatric care. Suppose psychological therapy administered in this situation is found to be beneficial (Paterson et al., 2018). In that case, it will have far-reaching consequences for the design of inpatient care for persons suffering from serious mental illnesses. Furthermore, it would question established beliefs that therapy may be unsuitable for this patient population.

However, assessing the efficacy of therapy for acute mental inpatients is a difficult challenge. While single-blind, randomized controlled trials have high internal validity, the experimental design may restrict the extent to which their conclusions have external validity (Paterson et al., 2018). Patients who are ill, suicidal, or in crisis may be less likely to participate in this research or be specifically excluded (Paterson et al., 2018). Currently, clinical studies may be more acceptable to this population and their doctors in this scenario (Paterson et al., 2018). However, it is uncertain if such investigations yield different outcomes than single-blind randomized controlled trials and, if so, whether this is due to decreased internal validity or greater external validity.

Therefore, providing psychological treatment in an acute psychiatric inpatient care context is related to reductions in readmissions, total psychotic symptoms, and reductions in sadness and anxiety (Paterson et al., 2018). However, randomization and rater blinding were adversely related to these results. Adequately powered studies that strive to maximize internal and external validity are now necessary to overcome the limitations of the available data. Further research is required to understand better particular components of therapy that promote recovery (Paterson et al., 2018). Consider the therapeutic relationship, distress management, or issue formulation (Paterson et al., 2018). Whether such therapy improves patient-centred outcomes such as quality of life, self-esteem, or recovery is unknown, and future research should explore these critical outcomes.

Berry et al. (2022) argued that psychological therapies had been shown to promote patient well-being and independence. Patients in acute mental health wards, on the other hand, frequently do not have access to evidence-based psychological therapy. Such treatment for serious mental health disorders (Berry et al., 2022). The overarching goal of this work program is to improve patient access to psychological therapy in acute mental health inpatient units. The first stage of the program, which is now complete, attempted to identify the challenges and facilitators to providing treatment in these contexts. The primary product of stage one was an intervention regimen intended for use in acute wards. It seeks to expand patient access to psychologically informed treatment and therapy (Berry et al., 2022). The program's second stage evaluates the intervention's impact on patient well-being. In addition, there have been major occurrences on the ward and patient social functioning and symptoms. Other factors include staff fatigue, ward environment from both the staff and patient viewpoints, and the intervention's economic effectiveness.

Moreover, Berry et al. (2022) ascertained that the patient on the ward would receive a tiered model of care intervention at one of three levels during the intervention time. The multidisciplinary ward team will determine the amount of care provided to the patient, considering the patient's and caregivers' desires and requirements (Berry et al., 2022). All patients will have a psychological formulation at the start of the process. A formulation creates a basis for integrating biological, sociological, cultural, and psychological elements responsible for the genesis and maintenance of issues, facilitating the design and implementation of the most effective intervention (Berry et al., 2022). The formulation will concentrate on the growth or maintenance of challenges based on the demands of the persons involved and the information provided (Berry et al., 2022). There is no precise therapy model prescribed because various psychologists may be trained in different techniques, and the formulation process is thought to be more significant than the exact methodology. Based on the formulation at Step One, conversations evaluate if the patient might benefit from a Phase two or three intervention. All ward staff must attend a half-day training session at the start of the intervention period (Berry et al., 2022). This beginning training course introduces psychosocial models of mental health and their role and development process.

Paterson et al. (2018) claimed that the efficiency of psychological treatment may also be influenced by the acute ward setting, which is not always seen as therapeutic, safe, or favourable to emotional disclosure by patients or staff. Indeed, some standards urge that patients be released before beginning therapy (Paterson et al., 2018). Determining the efficacy of therapy for persons in this acute environment has become more critical in light of the increased demand for this treatment from patients, caregivers, and providers and acknowledging that agencies must do more to improve the experience of patients receiving inpatient psychiatric care. Suppose psychological treatment administered in this environment is found to be beneficial (Paterson et al., 2018). In that case, it will have substantial consequences for the design of inpatient care for persons with severe mental health disorders, challenging conventional beliefs that therapy is inappropriate for this patient group.

However, assessing the efficacy of therapy for acute mental inpatients is a difficult challenge (Paterson et al., 2018). While single-blind, randomized controlled trials (R.C.T.s) have high internal validity, their experimental design may restrict the extent to which their conclusions are externally valid. Patients who are ill, suicidal, or in crisis may be less likely to participate in this research or be specifically excluded (Paterson et al., 2018). Non-RCTs may be more acceptable to this group and their doctors in this scenario. However, according to Paterson et al. (2018), it is uncertain if such trials provide different results than single-blind R.C.T.s and, if so, whether this is due to decreased internal validity or greater external validity.

Gonzales and Hairston (2021) claimed that psychotic diseases appear in various ways. Many approaches for them already include a variety of treatment techniques: This simplifies the treatment of co-occurring disorders. Case managers can send clients with psychotic illnesses to additional treatment or supportive services, and psychiatrists can modify drug regimens to identify development symptoms or concomitant problems (Gonzales & Hairston, 2021). Individuals with psychotic illnesses are more likely to have co-occurring drug use disorders. According to research, up to three-fourths of persons with psychotic illnesses also have a drug use issue at some point in their lives. Substance abuse and psychotic illnesses are often treated with different but linked programs (Gonzales & Hairston, 2021): This implies that persons with dual diagnoses are seen by various physicians who are all part of the same treatment team. Therapists, psychiatrists, case managers, and other team members interact and coordinate therapies in integrated methods.

Gonzales and Hairston (2021) state that people with co-occurring illnesses typically attend mental health and drug abuse treatment groups. Individual treatment frequently includes motivational enhancement techniques, which are more helpful for patients with dual disorders (Gonzales & Hairston, 2021). Medication management is sometimes used to treat both psychosis and drug use disorders by using replacement or agonist medicines such as buprenorphine and naltrexone. In some situations, what appear to be founder psychotic and drug use problems turn out to be drug psychosis (Gonzales & Hairston, 2021). When the substance is no longer used, the symptoms of substance-induced psychosis usually go away. When a person is physically dependent on a substance, the symptoms of substance-induced psychosis might last until the withdrawal phase is over.

Mental health nurses work with their patients to improve their emotional health, psychological well-being, and physical health. When interacting with clients, mental health nurses can comprehend their clients' mental health disorders, understand what might aggravate their mental health condition, and learn how to treat their symptoms (Foster et al., 2020). Clients may be suffering from depression, anxiety, bipolar illness, or schizophrenia, among other problems. Of fact, there are a variety of additional conditions. Mental health nursing is a fascinating and complex field in which nurses must possess various abilities. Assessment and treatments in mental health and mental health promotion and prevention. In addition, pharmaceutical management, specialist counselling, and psychotherapy are available. Finally, examples include teaching and training, direct nursing care, and research and evaluation.

As a newly qualified nurse, I will quickly learn relevant leadership skills to ensure I execute vital plans to help clients recover from the acute ward.

According to Barr and Dowding (2015), newly certified nurses are expected to swiftly learn clinical leadership abilities to offer safe, high-quality patient care. Modern leadership experts debate many conceptions of what leadership is; as a result, there is no concrete explanation of what leadership entails. According to Bach and Ellis (2011), a leader must be an effective, trustworthy advocate who inspires brave action by leveraging two-way communication to understand the needs of those involved in the environment.

Conversely, Dahlkemper (2017) asserts that, despite these various definitions, most theorists can agree on basic characteristics that define what it is to be a leader. Because each leader brings unique skills, some leaders are decisive and self-assured, while others are gregarious and extroverted (Northouse, 2017). Major (2019) states that strong leadership at all levels is a vital part of healthcare practice and is connected with the provision of safe, effective, quality, person-centred care. According to Stanley (2016), it contributes to an engaged and positive staff culture, which leads to high levels of patient satisfaction and improved outcomes. According to Sharples and Elcock (2011), some freshly certified nurses believe that leadership is solely the domain of senior personnel. According to Burton and Ormond (2011), good clinical leadership has been emphasized in the scholarly literature and several government studies. Recent inquiries, commissions, and investigations have emphasized the importance of clinician participation and clinical leadership in attaining and maintaining gains in care quality and patient safety.

As a newly qualified nurse, I will embrace and join Preceptorship programs.

As Scott and Spouse (2013) highlighted, preceptorship programs are one intervention that can assist newly trained nurses in strengthening their role and leadership abilities. According to Johnstone (2017), a preceptorship program is a structured teaching and learning approach. A preceptor or a newly certified nurse collaborates for a certain period to grow their function while bridging the theory-to-practice gap efficiently.

Several studies have been undertaken in recent years to examine the association between preceptorship programs and the development of nursing leaders. Banks et al. (2011) investigated the influence of 'Flying Start' on newly certified nurses' personal and professional development (N.Q.N.). The study employed a multimethod research design that included face-to-face and focused group interviews and questionnaires on collecting data from chosen individuals. According to their findings, most of the N.Q.N. indicated that 'Flying Start' had a favourable impact on their confidence and medical skill development. Notably, the researchers discovered that comprehensive support for nurses during placement was critical to their performance as to future nurse leaders. The ability to triangulate, which allows researchers to witness the same phenomena using multiple methodologies, is one of the primary benefits of employing a mixed-method study design. On the negative side, critical ethical criteria, such as ensuring participants' confidentiality and anonymity while participating in the study, were ignored (Banks et al., 2011). Given these constraints, it may not be easy to use the findings in clinical settings that adhere to high ethical standards.

Ekström and Idvall (2015) performed qualitative research to evaluate the experiences of a newly certified registered nurse in a leadership role in a care team on the award. The study was guided by the idea that nurses' leadership characteristics reflect the quality of care they deliver to patients under their supervision. According to their findings, inexperience is related to poor delegating and prioritization among newly trained nurses. Because participants were recruited from various wards, the strategy also allowed the researchers to avoid generalization of findings the investigation of diverse experiences

As a newly qualified nurse, I will effectively employ excellent communication skills to implement treatment for my psychotic client.

Potter et al. (2010) conducted a qualitative descriptive study and discovered that excellent communication was critical for efficient delegation procedures. It was discovered, in particular, that proper delegation was heavily reliant on clear, concise, and complete communication. Furthermore, the research found that communication was aided by the effective and timely exchange of critical information, allowing the team to anticipate a demanding workload. According to the paper, disputes resulting from personality, work ethic, age, role, and management were caused by delegating. Conflict arose when the delegates were older than the freshly trained nurse. For example, younger, freshly qualified nurses found it difficult to assign work to senior nursing assistants owing to opposition from the latter, resulting in conflict. It was mostly due to the freshly trained nurse's weak communication skills while interacting with older nursing assistants.

Potter et al. (2010) consistently emphasized another communication issue connected with work ethics in producing disagreements. Conflicts emerged because 'over delegation' was a sign of laziness and nurses' reluctance to assist when requested (Potter et al. 2010). Given its detailed consideration of the different elements that may impede seamless delegation, this research undoubtedly gives useful insights into the idea of delegation. It is also extremely reputable because the researchers employed proper methodology and data gathering approaches such as in-depth group interviews. Another advantage of doing group interviews is that it allows for discourse among respondents about the authors' questions.

As a newly qualified nurse, I will recognize my working environment and adopt a positive attitude toward my client.

In quantitative research, Gravlin and Bittner (2010) investigated the effect of attitude as a barrier to seamless delegation. The findings revealed that the attitude of the nursing assistant, as well as other factors such as knowledge and competence, influenced effective delegation. The study also discovered that successful delegation was hampered when members from the same nursing group had opposing viewpoints: This may be because people come from various backgrounds, which means that their values are influenced by elements such as culture, age, religion, ethnicity, political affiliation, and many more. Furthermore, mistrust between the care assistant and the nurse might impact successful delegation. As a result, nurses must cultivate trust since they are expected to cope with the consequences of errors due to their responsibilities in the role (N.M.C. 2015). The study also linked poor delegation to a work environment marked by ambiguous reporting structures and job descriptions. The poor delegation was also connected to a lack of clear definitions of responsibilities. As a result, creating well-defined responsibilities lowers disputes that frequently develop during delegation. Potter et al. (2010) made a similar observation, claiming that the major source of disagreements between care assistants and nurses was the belief that the care assistants' function was comparable to that of the N.Q.N. except for settings including the administration of medicine. In other words, care assistants were uninformed of the nurse's clinical decision-making and patient care management responsibilities.

To summarize, attitude is a typical impediment to efficient delegation, and some of the major causes of attitude among nurses are age differences, role confusion, work ethic, personality, and disobedience. The study's main strength is its data-gathering strategy, conducted through semi-structured interviews. As the researchers secured the subjects' agreement, they addressed any ethical concerns. In contrast, just thirteen people were recruited for the study, resulting in very small population size. In summary, generalizing the conclusions of this study may be incorrect.

As a newly certified nurse working in the critical care unit, I plan to exhibit strong delegation skills that allow me to provide thorough, patient-centred care.

According to Barrow and Sharma (2019), responsibility, authority, and accountability are crucial components of delegation. In terms of accountability, nurses have an ethical and professional commitment to providing trustworthy patient care. In terms of authority, nurses are required to accomplish responsibilities following nurse practice acts, job descriptions, and administrative regulations. Accountability refers to nurses' legal duties for activities taken while providing patient care. As a result, possible ethical and legal limits regarding delegation in nursing may occur. According to Gravlin and Bittner (2010), research may explain why most newly qualified nurses struggle with successful delegating. In this context, this section attempts to give a critical perspective on how my delegation skills and others might be developed to guarantee that professional nursing practice continues to improve throughout and beyond the preceptorship term.

The notion of delegation is seen differently in the existing literature on the subject. On the other hand, the American Nurses Association provides the most generally used definition. According to their definition, delegation transfers responsibility for executing a task from one individual to another while remaining accountable for the outcome. Scholars generally agree that accountability and responsibility are important aspects of delegation in nursing practice despite differing perspectives on delegation. Given this, improper delegation may result in unforeseen negative outcomes during or after aftercare delivery. While previous research has demonstrated that different nurses have varied delegation techniques (Magnusson 2017), I think delegation's five rights should guide ethical, professional, and legal decision-making about delegation. According to Barrow and Sharma (2019), the right task, the right situation, the right person, the right supervision, and the right direction and communication.

The 2009 Mid Staffs Scandal in Stafford hospital was a typical example of how improper delegation led to significant professional misconduct. Specifically, it was discovered that between 2005 and 2009, the hospital had the highest number of fatalities of any institution in the country (Campbell 2013). Following investigations, the fatalities were traced to inadequate hospital treatment. Notably, the primary reason for inadequate treatment was a nurse shortage. Because of the nursing shortfall, staff members were overworked; hence, a delegation of duty is done at random to make up for the loss. It was also alleged that several nurses lacked sympathy while dealing with patients. At the same time, other patients were prematurely discharged from the hospital, causing them to return later (Campbell 2013): This might be ascribed to nurses being allocated responsibilities that are not within their job description or competency.

As a freshly licensed nurse, I must learn what appropriate duties to delegate. Whenever I felt the need to delegate certain work throughout the preceptorship program, I decided based on two questions: what types of obligations are legally permissible and what types of responsibilities are not permissible to assign. I recognized that I needed to become acquainted with administrative and nursing practice act regulations to answer these concerns properly. In general, duties like planning, assessment, and evaluation should be conducted solely by registered nurses as part of the nursing process. As a result, nonregistered nurses are legally prohibited from doing these duties.

Conclusion

The paper focused on mental health nurses caring for patients with psychosis in the acute inpatient ward. The safety discourse outlines the nature of providing care for nurses working in mental health inpatient care settings, guiding the identification of risks posed by the clients in their care and the treatments used to address these risks. The primary goal of inpatient psychiatric care is protection, yet this soft ideal is anchored in fear, shame, and a history of institutionalization. Nursing techniques intended to maintain safety in inpatient settings are ineffectual and damaging to both patients and nurses. Still, their continued use is justified by the formulation and operational definitions of the safety value. Although safety is an important aspect of inpatient psychiatric nursing care, its framing and application must change to establish conditions that are viewed as really safe and allow meaningful therapeutic engagement and therapy.

Recognizing that psychotic symptoms are not a pathologic experience can make individuals feel less bewildered or fearful, and it may be a means to reach an agreement between the patient's and the clinician's explanatory model, which will have a good influence on rehabilitation and stigma (Carter et al., 2016). It will also improve patient-doctor interaction. When psychotic symptoms are interpreted as an out-of-control natural (defence) mechanism, treatment might focus on strengthening the underlying vulnerability and recovering cognitive control rather than treating the psychotic symptoms. Interventions that might teach greater cognitive performance, alleviate stress, or promote self-consciousness may aid patients who have psychosis regain control from within (Scheepers et al., 2018). Antipsychotic medicine may aid in the regulation/inhibition of psychotic defensive systems from the outside (Scheepers et al., 2018). The objective of this medicine will be to lower psychotic symptoms to a level that the patient can live with and manage during activities rather than eliminate them.

References

Adamou, M. (2005). Community Service Models for Schizophrenia: Evidence-based implications and future directions. Psychiatry, 2(2), 24–30.

Allen, J., Balfour, R., Bell, R., & Marmot, M. (2014). Social Determinants of Mental Health. International Review of Psychiatry, 26(4), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2014.928270  

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

Barker, P. J., & Buchanan-Barker, P. (2011). Mental health nursing and the politics of recovery: A global reflection. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 25(5), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2011.03.009  

Barker, P., & Buchanan-Barker, P. (2010). The Tidal Model of Mental Health Recovery and reclamation: Application in acute care settings. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 31(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840903276696  

Barrow, J. M., & Sharma, S. (2022). Five Rights of Nursing Delegation (1st ed.). StatPearls.

Beck, A. T., & Bredemeier, K. (2016). A unified model of depression. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4), 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616628523  

Berry, K., Raphael, J., Wilson, H., Bucci, S., Drake, R. J., Edge, D., Emsley, R., Gilworth, G., Lovell, K., Odebiyi, B., Price, O., Sutton, M., Winter, R., & Haddock, G. (2022). A cluster randomized controlled trial of a ward-based intervention to improve access to psychologically-informed care and psychological therapy for mental health in-patients. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03696-7  

Bjerknes, M. S., & Bjørk, I. T. (2012). Entry into nursing: An ethnographic study of newly qualified nurses taking on the nursing role in a hospital setting. Nursing Research and Practice, 2012, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/690348  

Björkdahl, A., Palmstierna, T., & Hansebo, G. (2010). The bulldozer and the ballet dancer: Aspects of nurses' caring approaches in Acute Psychiatric Intensive Care. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 17(6), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01548.x  

Browne, G., Hurley, J., & Lakeman, R. (2014). Mental health nursing: What difference does it make? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 21(6), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12162  

Buse, K., & Hawkes, S. (2015). Health in the sustainable development goals: Ready for a paradigm shift? Globalization and Health, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0098-8  

Caldwell, B. A., Sclafani, M., Swarbrick, M., & Piren, K. (2010). Psychiatric Nursing Practice & the Recovery Model of Care. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 48(7), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20100504-03  

Campbell, D. (2013, February 6). Mid Staffs Hospital Scandal: The essential guide. The Guardian. Retrieved April 16, 2022, from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/feb/06/mid-staffs-hospital-scandal-guide  

Carter, L., Read, J., Pyle, M., & Morrison, A. P. (2016). The impact of causal explanations on outcome in people experiencing psychosis: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24(2), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2002  

Castillo, E. G., Ijadi-Maghsoodi, R., Shadravan, S., Moore, E., Mensah, M. O., Docherty, M., Aguilera Nunez, M. G., Barcelo, N., Goodsmith, N., Halpin, L. E., Morton, I., Mango, J., Montero, A. E., Rahmanian Koushkaki, S., Bromley, E., Chung, B., Jones, F., Gabrielian, S., Gelberg, L., … Wells, K. B. (2019). Community interventions to promote mental health and social equity. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1017-0  

Choudry, A., & Farooq, S. (2018). Psychosis and related disorders in International Classification of disease-11 and their relationship to Diagnostic and statistical manual-5 and International Classification of disease-10. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 34(5), 11.

https://doi.org/10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_20_18  

Cleary, M., Hunt, G. E., Horsfall, J., & Deacon, M. (2012). Nurse-patient interaction in acute adult inpatient mental health units: A review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2011.622428  

Delaney, K. R. (2012). Moving to a recovery framework of care: Focusing attention on process. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 26(2), 165–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2011.12.005  

Ekström, L., & Idvall, E. (2013). Being a team leader: Newly Registered Nurses relate their experiences. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12085  

Gabrielsson, S., Tuvesson, H., Wiklund Gustin, L., & Jormfeldt, H. (2020). Positioning psychiatric and mental health nursing as a transformative force in health care. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 41(11), 976–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1756009  

Gonzales, M., & Hairston, S. (2021, August 25). Treatment for psychotic disorders. The Recovery Village Drug and Alcohol Rehab. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/mental-health/psychosis/treatment/  

Gravlin, G., & Phoenix Bittner, N. (2010). Nurses' and nursing assistants' reports of missed care and delegation. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(7/8), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0b013e3181e9395e  

Happell, B., Scott, D., Platania-Phung, C., & Nankivell, J. (2012). Should we or shouldn't we? Mental Health Nurses' views on physical health care of mental health consumers. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 21(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00799.x   

Hawke, L. D., Mehra, K., Settipani, C., Relihan, J., Darnay, K., Chaim, G., & Henderson, J. (2019). What makes mental health and substance use services youth friendly? A scoping review of literature. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4066-5  

Jacobsen, P., Hodkinson, K., Peters, E., & Chadwick, P. (2018). A systematic scoping review of psychological therapies for psychosis within acute psychiatric in-patient settings. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(2), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.106  

Jormfeldt, H., Doyle, L., Ellilä, H., Lahti, M., Higgins, A., Keogh, B., Meade, O., Stickley, T., Sitvast, J., Skärsäter, I., & Kilkku, N. (2018). Master’s Level Mental Health Nursing Competencies, a prerequisite for equal health among service users in Mental Health Care. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(sup1), 1502013. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1502013  

Keogh, B., Doyle, L., Ellila, H., Higgins, A., Jormfeldt, H., Lahti, M., Meade, O., Sitvast, J., Skärsäter, I., Stickley, T., & Kilkku, N. (2017). Developing e-learning materials in Mental Health: The ementhe project. Mental Health Practice, 20(5), 36–37. https://doi.org/10.7748/mhp.2017.e1208  

Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O'Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of Mental Health Care: A Global Perspective. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20482  

Lally, J., & MacCabe, J. H. (2015). Antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: A Review. British Medical Bulletin, 114(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldv017  

Lawrie, S. M., O’Donovan, M. C., Saks, E., Burns, T., & Lieberman, J. A. (2016). Improving classification of psychoses. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00577-5  

Magnusson, C., Allan, H., Horton, K., Johnson, M., Evans, K., & Ball, E. (2017). An analysis of delegation styles among newly qualified nurses. Nursing Standard, 31(25), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2017.e9780  

Miller, B. F., & Druss, B. (2013). The role of family physicians in mental health care delivery in the United States: Implications for health reform. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 26(2), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.02.120346  

Muskett, C. (2013). Trauma-informed care in inpatient mental health settings: A review of the literature. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 23(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12012  

Paterson, C., Karatzias, T., Dickson, A., Harper, S., Dougall, N., & Hutton, P. (2018). Psychological therapy for inpatients receiving Acute Mental Health Care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(4), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12182  

Potter, P., Deshields, T., & Kuhrik, M. (2010). Delegation practices between registered nurses and nursing assistive personnel. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01062.x  

Razzaque, R., Okoro, E., & Wood, L. (2013). Mindfulness in clinician therapeutic relationships. Mindfulness, 6(2), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0241-7  

Scheepers, F. E., de Mul, J., Boer, F., & Hoogendijk, W. J. (2018). Psychosis as an evolutionary adaptive mechanism to changing environments. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00237  

Scheick, D. M. (2011). Developing self-aware mindfulness to manage countertransference in the nurse-client relationship: An evaluation and developmental study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.10.005  

Sebergsen, K., Norberg, A., & Talseth, A.-G. (2016). Confirming mental health care in acute psychiatric wards, as narrated by persons experiencing psychotic illness: An interview study. BMC Nursing, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0126-x  

Shoesmith, W. D. (2011). The classification of psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 198(4), 323–323. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.198.4.323a  

Slemon, A., Jenkins, E., & Bungay, V. (2017). Safety in psychiatric inpatient care: The impact of risk management culture on mental health nursing practice. Nursing Inquiry, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12199  

Srinivasan, S., Bettella, F., Mattingsdal, M., Wang, Y., Witoelar, A., Schork, A. J., Thompson, W. K., Zuber, V., Winsvold, B. S., Zwart, J.-A., Collier, D. A., Desikan, R. S., Melle, I., Werge, T., Dale, A. M., Djurovic, S., & Andreassen, O. A. (2016). Genetic markers of human evolution are enriched in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 80(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.009  

Sugiura, T., Sakamoto, S., Tanaka, E., Tomoda, A., & Kitamura, T. (2001). Labeling effect of Seishin-bunretsu-byou, the Japanese translation for schizophrenia: An argument for relabeling. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 47(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076400104700204  

Thibeault, C. A., Trudeau, K., d’Entremont, M., & Brown, T. (2010). Understanding the milieu experiences of patients on an acute inpatient psychiatric unit. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 24(4), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2009.07.002  

Thornicroft, G., & Tansella, M. (2012). The Balanced Care Model for Global Mental Health. Psychological Medicine, 43(4), 849–863. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291712001420  

Tyrberg, M. (2019). Bringing psychological treatment to the psychiatric ward: Affecting patients, staff, and the milieu. Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.

van Dongen, J., & Boomsma, D. I. (2013). The evolutionary paradox and the missing heritability of schizophrenia. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 162(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32135  

Van Sant, J. E., & Patterson, B. J. (2013). Getting in and getting out whole: Nurse-patient connections in the psychiatric setting. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 34(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2012.715321  

Wood, L., Williams, C., Billings, J., & Johnson, S. (2019). Psychologists’ perspectives on the implementation of psychological therapy for psychosis in the acute psychiatric inpatient setting. Qualitative Health Research, 29(14), 2048–2056. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319843499