Strategic Risk Management Essay: Lego's Approaches.

The following structure and headings are recommended, amongst others:

1. Introduction, context and objectives.
Identification of the issue(s), explanation of the context of the report, with links to project/operational and strategic/corporate risk management.

2. Literature review
A critical review of appropriate literature in relation to the subject area, to reflect current thinking and effective practice; a thematic approach should be adopted which includes a summary

3. Findings and conclusions
Presentation of the case study findings, grouped by important issues or themes. Overall conclusions which flow from the analysis and link to the literature review and also to the management approaches articulated in section 1 above.

4. Recommendations and implementation
Recommendations which are feasible, practicable, and persuasive, and which recognise barriers or points of resistance and how these might be overcome.

Strategic Definition and Focus

Lego is one of the largest and popular toy manufacturer established by Ole Kirk Christinansen of Denmark. In a very short time the company went from a small toy seller to a large scale conglomerate.  The strategic risk management and assessment approaches have enabled the company in meeting its goal. The strategic definition is based on defining scenario based process where the primary focus is to generate better focus.   The strategic issues are undertaking the process that has a potential to help the company for the purpose of gaining insight. It is helpful in managing the process and allowing Lego in gaining better roles and responsibility. It is allowing the company in gearing up organizational goals. It is evident from the point of maintaining a balance.  It is necessary for maintaining a balance in between the organizational development. For assessing the risk it is highly important to develop an action plan.  These plans are important enough for gaining accuracy in order to sustain effectiveness.  This is important to manage the resources and allowing better options in order to generate effectiveness.  It is therefore necessary for generating resources that are important to allocate resources. This is effective from the point of view of giving up inefficiency.  There is a requirement to signify the importance of long term goals in order to manage the circumstances. It is necessary enough for ascertaining the roles and responsibility that has to be made for the purpose of generating effective role (Wook, et al 2016).

 Risk management is important from the point of generating effectiveness.  The risk management tools are used to attain roles and responsibility in order to gain competency. These factors are essential for maintaining a reasonable balance in order to generate proficient results. The factors are equally important for maintaining a balance and acquiring growth in order to achieve sustainability. It is effective from the point of attaining a balance in order to gain effective role. This is evident for the company to manage the roles in order to gain proficiency (McNeil, Frey & Embrechts, 2015).  The organizational proficiency is necessary for matching up with the expectation. It is therefore important for strategic implementation.  This is important from the point of gaining major database that will be used in order to match up organizational expectation. It is important for the strategic implementation of resources and allocating the best possible outcome.   The key risk management process has empowered Lego to "evade a couple of hit." For instance, the procedure enabled the organization to diminish the impact of higher oil costs, which influence the cost of materials and coordination’s. It likewise has kept away from disturbances via deliberately overseeing advances starting with one outside supplier then onto the next (Hofmann & Scordis, 2017).  

Risk Management for Organizational Proficiency

"As an organization, we are presently more forceful and ready to make bigger speculations than previously," he said. "The vital hazard administration process empowers us to concentrate on circumstances and take greater risks since we have characterized chance resilience’s and we can gauge and analyze our exposures." For instance, in the wake of experiencing a vital hazard appraisal, Lego was sufficiently certain to put and extend in the aggressive U.S. toy industry with 25% in that market amid 2011, in spite of by and large level development of the market general. The organization additionally could distinguish the potential for higher request of its Ninja go toy line. This has developed extra limit and have the boldness to anticipate higher deals by utilizing understanding increased through risk management."Key risk management is as yet a moderately new region, and the world we work in is always showing signs of change. On the off chance that we are to apply it to more unequivocal dangers in the association, at that point we will require a more streamlined process (Soltanizadeh, et al 2016).

The ERM database is collected in order to assess the risk. It is mostly important to organize effective features that are important to raise resources. In the whole process it is evident to manage the proficiency by handling the risk factors and gathering the information in order to gain productivity. These factors are evident not only for the organizations but also to the employees. It is necessary enough for matching the customers’ expectations and allowing the company in gaining effectiveness. The database helps in matching up with the customer’s requirements that has allowed in defining exposure to risk. It is evident from the point of managing minute details regarding the organization (Fraser & Simkins, 2016). The database therefore helps in implementing the information in a correct way. This will certainly help in managing the business functions from a positive perspective. It is allocating the risk in a way that allow in managing effectiveness.   It is necessary for maintaining the resources in order to undertake resources.  It is important from the point of developing evident resources in order to attain basic 1 of view of matching up with the individual expectations and gaining role that will help in accompanying resourcefulness. On strategy implementation we have a defined tool and process for active risk and opportunity planning and management, which is mandatory for major business projects, and strategy implementation. On strategy execution, Lego has implemented ERM to collect and document risks and their assessments handling.  Overall data maintained is evident from the point of defining an overall risk exposure vs. the defined risk tolerance (Frigo & Anderson, 2014).

Key Risk Management Process

The concept of risk management is different from risk aversion. In the beginning there is a misconception that, it’s all about avoiding risks. But the risk is a part of a business. The risk management project is related to defining the efforts that will help in managing resourcefulness. It is important for gaining long run growth and sustainable results.  It is necessary for managing the factors in order to gain pre-defined goals (Mazzeo, et al 2017).  The risk management factors are important enough for matching the project cost.  It is effective from the point of generating better risk management process. It is important enough for ensuring efficiency.  This is not important from the point of view of gaining better role and responsibility. It is important for gaining effectiveness and professing the knowledge in order to develop role.   The purpose is to generate roles that are having potential to manage organizational growth (Andersen & Ross, 2016).

At the time, the organization had no particular risk management activity. However, in 2006, Jesper Ovesen, at that point CFO of Lego, coordinated Mr. Læssøe to build up a formalized vital risk management process for the organization. The point was to stay away from the missteps of the past and help deal with the vulnerabilities of working in a worldwide commercial center. In spite of the fact that Mr. Læssøe had been at Lego for somewhere in the range of 25 years, he had no involvement in chance administration around then. He start perusing everything on hazard administration that he could lay his hands on, yet Mr. Læssøe said he picked up the most information from the experience of different organizations (Coombs & Holladay, 2015).

The overall purpose of a risk management is to gather information and apply the same in order to gain results. For managing the organization results, it is evident to allocate the resources in a way that allow in managing the functions. It is necessary for a business to evaluate the most effective resources and focus s on implementing the diagnostic tool. The tool will be effective in managing the business so that it is possible for the business organization to generate results. It is necessary for maintaining a balance and gathering the resources in order to measure the effective role. It is helpful in maintaining a balance and allowing better role and responsibility(Driscoll,2014).

 Thus for an organization it is important to match up with the individual expectation and to attain distinguish role and responsibility. This will help in focusing on the resources and matching up with the long-term effectiveness. It is necessary for managing the roles in an organization in order to match up with the expectations of people associated with it.  This is necessary for attaining better roles that will increase the certainty.  It is evident and important from the point of view of helping the organization in matching up with the expectations. This is necessary for ascertaining the growth o different resources and allocating the most possible way in managing business.  It is necessary for matching up with the organization expectation in order to gain effectiveness(Andersen,Garvey & Roggi, 2014).  It is necessary for utilizing the resources and applying the resourcefulness.  It is manageable for a business to generate effectiveness and allocating better resources in order to arrange the role in a better way(Tørning,Jaffari & Vatrapu, 2015).

Concept of Risk Management

 This is necessary for managing the role and responsibility that has a potential to gain opportunity. It is necessary for attaining the purpose and attaining responsibilities.  It is evident for maintaining results in a better way.  This is necessary for generating better results that are important for managing effectiveness in the organization. This is important enough for organizing effectiveness that has a potential to look into the matter.  It is evident from the point of gaining goals that has a purpose to meet the objective(Herber & Klös,2017).   It is necessary for maintaining a balance in order to generate better results. For gaining organizational effectiveness, this is important to look out the best output that will help in matching up the organizational requirements. It is necessary for matching up the individual requirements that are important for gaining results. This is important enough for managing results and organizing the best possible ways in order to avoid risk.  It is necessary for understanding different roles that would allow in matching up with the individual expectations.   The channels are important for understanding different aspects related to the risk management and applying the best possible diagnostic tool in order to manage the changes. This is necessary for understanding the better role. It is evident for managing the resources for gaining better resources. For placing the best opportunity it is necessary to develop the best possible way that can help in managing resource in an economy(Buglione, et al 2017).

This is significant for managing the changes and applying the best possible risk management technique in order to deal with the situation. It is evident for an individual to come up with a solution that will help in managing the situation and d gaining the result. It is necessary for managing the changes and developing the best possible ideas.  It is necessary for managing the resources and applying the organizational result for the purpose of managing resources. It is necessary for generating better role that are possibly important for gaining insight. This is important enough for distributing the organizational requirements for the purpose of meeting goals. This is necessary for maintaining goals that is necessary enough for attaining growth.  This is important enough for gaining effectiveness in order to generate better focus matching long term effectiveness.  It is necessary for maintaining a balance in order to gain better role and responsibility. This is important for matching up with the expectations and attaining the result.  It is important for gaining accuracy and permitting the better roles and responsibility. This is important from the point of matching growth.  It is important for the purpose of generating results that are beneficial for the organization.  In the wake of losing its direction early this decade, Lego A.S. looked to key hazard administration as a major aspect of its endeavors to remake its main concern(Radomska, 2014).

Lego's Strategic Risk Management Journey

Risk management is for the purpose of bright building squares wouldn't dream of setting out on a noteworthy activity without first directing a key appraisal. Incompletely because of vital hazard administration endeavors that started in 2006, the 80-year-old family-controlled organization has delighted in enormous achievement. Regardless of a stale toy showcase generally, Lego has tripled its income since 2004. The endeavors developed from deals that stagnated in the late 1990s and mid 2000s when the firmly held organization lost its engaged way to deal with technique and development and was crushing investor(Robertson, 2017).

Specifically, he esteemed the trading of learning with his companions at other European firms through the European Committee of Key risk management, a system composed by the Meeting Board Inc. The initial step was to set up a particular procedure to address vital dangers under the organization's undertaking hazard administration umbrella. Lego likewise hoped to build up unified ERM announcing. Amid this underlying stage, Mr. Læssøe drew on the aggregate "brightness" of somewhere in the range of 35 master center chiefs who added to a database of dangers and their dealing. When this stage was under way, Mr. Læssøe started to take a gander at adding proactive devices to help Lego's most senior chiefs in their basic leadership forms. These apparatuses included Monte Carlo to better comprehend instability in monetary execution and to help characterize chance resistance. The following enormous task was the production of what Lego calls its dynamic hazard and opportunity arranging process, a reliable and precise approach to set up the business case for huge speculations and activities. All the more as of late, Lego formulated a situation testing process — known as getting ready for vulnerability — to test the flexibility of vital choices. All things considered, these means are gone for moving danger administration up the administration chain, getting senior administrators included before in Lego's key arranging. The instruments and procedures now are utilized for every single significant venture and key difficulties. For instance, Lego connected the SRM procedure to its test of developing its business in Asia(Hill, Jones & Schilling,2014).

"Instead of simply depending on gut senses, we can extend in Asia knowing the dangers and openings, maintaining a strategic distance from most dark swans," or major, unexpected occasions.

Risk management isn't just about the best layer of a gathering. It ought to be a piece of what you do as an organization consistently. You need to see a characteristic way to deal with chance administration where individuals get some information about vulnerabilities, instead of just concentrating on deals or benefit targets. Lego additionally is thinking about utilizing situation testing for key dangers past those secured by the key changes, for example, interest in new innovation, creation offices or item improvement.  To the extent Mr. Læssøe is concerned, key risk management is planned to "bolster cognizant decisions," not to settle on business choices for administration (Wheelen & Hunger, 2017)."

Conclusion

To conclude, Lego has well implemented the risk management strategies in their business in order to gain effective roles. This has not only helped in meeting the organizational objective but also allowed in matching the expectations.  In case of wide gaps these strategy are important enough in handling the situation by managing the process. This strategy is important enough to deal with organizing the resources and meeting the gap. It is necessary for managing long term effectiveness in order to match up different aspect of risk management. This is important to meet the long-term risk management process in order to gain competency. It is necessary to match up the expectation in order to manage the resources.  This is important for understanding the expectations in order to manage the risk management resources and driving the competency.  It is important enough to measure the risk management process. It is necessary for implementing the risk management process in order to develop resources. It is important enough for gaining better roles and development in order to manage risk. This is important to manage the effectiveness in order to arrange better roles. For the process of gaining better risk management process it is necessary for balancing the gaps in order to attain effectiveness. The changes in the risk management process are important to gain competency.

References

Andersen, P., & Ross, J. W. (2016). Transforming the LEGO Group for the Digital Economy.

Andersen, T. J., Garvey, M., & Roggi, O. (2014). Managing risk and opportunity: The governance of strategic risk-taking. OUP Oxford.

Buglione, L., Gresse von Wangenheim, C., Hauck, J. C. R., & McCaffery, F. (2017). The LEGO maturity & capability model approach.

Coombs, T., & Holladay, S. (2015). CSR as crisis risk: expanding how we conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 144-162.

Driscoll, M. (2014). Enterprise risk management: Seven imperatives for process excellence. Corporate Finance Review, 19(3), 13.

Fraser, J. R., & Simkins, B. J. (2016). The challenges of and solutions for implementing enterprise risk management. Business Horizons, 59(6), 689-698.

Frigo, M. L., & Anderson, R. J. (2014). Risk management frameworks: adapt, don't adopt: here's a primer on how to use two well-known approaches. Strategic Finance, 95(7), 49-54.

Herber, P., & Klös, V. (2017). A multi-robot search using LEGO mindstorms: an embedded software design project. ACM SIGBED Review, 14(1), 61-70.

Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning.

Hofmann, A., & Scordis, N. (2017). Challenges in Applying Risk Management Concepts in Practice.

Mazzeo, M., Mazzeo, M., Merkley, G., & Merkley, G. (2017). LEGO® Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage. Kellogg School of Management Cases, 1-21.

McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton university press.

Radomska, J. (2014). Operational risk associated with the strategy implementation. Management, 18(2), 31-43.

Robertson, D. (2017). The Power of Little Ideas: A Low-Risk, High-Reward Approach to Innovation. Harvard Business Press.

Soltanizadeh, S., Soltanizadeh, S., Abdul Rasid, S. Z., Abdul Rasid, S. Z., Mottaghi Golshan, N., Mottaghi Golshan, N., ... & Wan Ismail, W. K. (2016). Business strategy, enterprise risk management and organizational performance. Management Research Review, 39(9), 1016-1033.

Tørning, K., Jaffari, Z., & Vatrapu, R. (2015, July). Current challenges in social media management. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Media & Society(p. 14). ACM.

Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2017). Strategic management and business policy. pearson.

Wook, K., Beresford, A. K. C., Pettit, S. J., Mason, R. J., & Sanchez Rodrigues, V. (2016). The roles of corporate culture in the selection of effective risk management strategies.