Key Factors For Effective Group Work And Learning In Engineering Management Essay. (70 Characters)

Leadership: A Crucial Factor in Group Work

In the following report we plan to address the key factors that are contributing towards the group work and the effectiveness of working together as a group. Furthermore, the report will incorporate its discussion based on the group learning paper and summarize what the group has learnt and how they have integrated the learning in future teams and projects (3). On the other hand, we will also discuss about the challenges and opportunities faced while working together as a team and what is the positive contribution of the team towards the work that they have been working together. Apart from the group work, the lit6erature review will also describe the specified events, cases and the entire learning that have been optimized from the current semester.

 The part of leadership is one of the most vital factors that is considered to be the success factor in any successful teamwork. Similarly, it works same for the role of the engineering managers who are a part of future engineers (4). Thus, the part of learning leadership skills is catered to be a part of the subject Principle of Leadership and Management which is a part of master of Engineering management program, which also prepares the students with various management roles in the specific industry. During the course learning it can be identified that Harry and the learning team 28 literature was selected and it had been placed within Week 4. This is more of an overview of what had happened next within the team. Just like the learning team 28, Team one’s approach was also casual, rather than establishing and discussing the team expectation and regulation. As time passed by the team had hoped that they would naturally gel together with time and with inclusion of new virtual environment, the new quietly stepped into the eye of the storm. Hence, the aspect of not conduct research on the individual’s strength and weakness it was the most difficult phase that had occurred in week 2 and week 3 during the Team Readiness Case Study exercise. However, the Learning Team 28 was frustrated were quietly brewing under the table and thus the storm was gradually getting more violent as frustrated continued to mount (5). During the same time the team had also introduced to learn charter MEM 5100. By forming the team charter was not a straightforward method but thus it was a vital tool which had significantly improved the team dynamics. Reflecting on charter template, it assisted to find the team norming it had explored the team core value, purpose, role, group norms and ways to measure success.

From one of the course assessments that was conducted by the team members had specified on the personality types of the BIOSTEM team members. However, it can be further analysed that in the beginning of the assessment the team had also conducted PAVF personality test that considers certain dominant factors P, A, V and the secondary factor is F personalities. With the help of this personality test the team members are able to achieve an overview on how they can help and understand one another in their team and where they can use their form of personality in order to receive the maximum outcome (6). In consideration of the dominant factor, it can be considered that the team members have helped to remained focused on track on the assessment. Furthermore, by constituting the dominant A within the team it can be analysed that the team members had emphasized its skills on analysing the case studies and lastly the dominant factor V have assisted to think out of the box and have incorporated the team members F to build strong relationship among the team members. This will further include the combination of all the attributes of different personalities which has made the team stronger in achieving their objectives (7). From the assessment that was conducted by the team members the result thar was derived from the above analysis had highlighted that the entire team is complexly diversified and the personalities does not match with any individual members. In this situation it had helped the team to explain why did they face a hard time working altogether towards the team readiness and preparation (8) From the assessment the team members have inculcated insights that they never received a chance of discuss regarding the lesson, formulate the team purpose, expectation, core value, group norms, expectation, standards and core value.

Challenges and Opportunities Faced by Teams While Working Together

Furthermore, in the following week the group learning was based on Rebecca Halstead. Analysing her traits, it can be stated that she was approachable and personable and had made it a point to not only get to know her soldiers well but also her family too. Due to this quality and effort of hers it made everyone love her not just like her but love her. Thus, this resulted to a high-performance organisational leader. It was further noticed that starting from the own group and other groups as well there was always members whose location was not familiar to some others in the group (9). Thus, all the members were grouped together and had made it a point of knowing one another. Relating to the genuine connection with one another it becomes much easier to perform. However, a strong personable connection between the team members have paved a clear path to achieve the core value. The responsibility fails for each team member in order to get to known the other team members well. In certain situation individuals felt short of achieving the value and objective from this reflection which would make it more subsequent semester.

The main focus on one of the module learning was on forming great relationships. It is often considered that a great relationship is required as high-performance organisation. The people feel sense of belongness when they form a great relationship and are engaged. As per team one the leader was encouraged to strive build effective relationships since they believe that a mixture in culture forms an effective group, making it more diverse. Therefore, relationship building is achieved through decision making, off job interactions, knowing team members and regular meetings (10). Thus, a team leader must have a strong personality, emotional intelligence and motivate members to achieve their goals. However, considering the factors of an engineering leader one can understand their members and this will allow to know how to treat them and how to solve the issues of lack of engagement. In this situation, open communication is often facilitated and it involves open communication and addressing the concerns. As per Chapter 5 of “Everyone a Leader” it applies to the learning model that brings in a stronger relationship and therefore, creates a win-win situation. In consideration of team one it starts to form and build the relationship that is between the team members by having an open communication in exchange to the thoughts of the group chat that they have created to known one another well. The team further believes that they should known each other well and this took place over a coffee meeting as well as assignment meetings in order to build an effective relationship among them. The main aims of conducting meetings were to know the personality of individual team member and build a stronger relationship within the team.

From the lesson discussed in the class it can be stated that the factors and importance of team dynamics is one of those topics that have created a massive impact on the team (11). From the lesson it can be derived that team dynamics is something that is learnt and understood as to how the team members hold distinct behaviours and role, thus creating an impact on other group members and on others as a whole. The factors of team dynamics are therefore the psychological and unconscious factors that creates an influence on the direction of the team’s performance and behaviour. Furthermore, that one thing thar was common within Team One was that each member had made their part clear and had understood the value and norms. This is therefore that part of productivity in which the team members has created a sense of ownership to work for others as they have so to do for themselves (12). The team had always focused on fulfilling its purpose and as efficient members of the team they have worked together to make it happen rather than just waiting on what can be done. On the other hand, after working effortlessly in the team, some of the major contributions that can be made as a part of ream dynamics are commitment of the team members, motivation, communication, creativity and strong bonding. By encouraging the team members, it took effort to create a level of confidence among the members as they are a part of an objective.

The summary of what the group has learned from the entire module is about the importance of teamwork along with the factors of team readiness, team dynamics and the theories that are related to team work and its effectives (13). Furthermore, the case study of “Katie Conboy-Leading Change at Simmons College had facilitated to gain insights about the succeeding factors of a team meetings where the case study emphasizes on exploring the change and leadership method as well as the behaviour that is required to build one’s credibility. On the other hand, the other case study based on Human centered service design had assisted to examine the IDEO with team and agreed that the innovation cultural technique, methodology is one of the world’s team leading designs which is a fixed case and is an example of what the executives can do to help the companies become more innovative.

 Conclusion 

Hence, it can be concluded that from the group discussion, group work and presenting the assessment together have enabled every member of the team to understand the significance of working together and how an effective team can work in a collaborative manner. Similarly, from the discussion section it can be stated that while working in a team with significant and helpful members it has encouraged every member to gain successful result and gain insights various different lessons covered in the class. When it comes to team work it is vital to enable the team to share their experience and duties which will not help them but also other members of the group to complete their task. On the other hand, it will also enable them to meet the learning outcomes of the assessment that they are working for. One of the biggest reason the members prefer to be a part of Team one is because every member of the group knowns how to influence and motivate one another. Furthermore, the overall experience of undertaking the subject of engineering leaders and management t will help each and every individual in nurturing talents and ability so that as a team they can work in unity and in a cohesion manner.

Reference 

1. Temelkova M. The Relation “Digital Leadership–Swarm Management–Lean Organization” in the Digital Smart Organizations. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review. 2020(Special Issue):247.
2. Cavusoglu C, Karatas H. Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Self-determination theory and academic motivation. The Anthropologist. 2015 Jun 1;20(3):735-43.
3. Raziq A, Maulabakhsh R. Impact of working environment on job satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015 Jan 1;23:717-25.
4. Drucker PF. The effective executive. Routledge; 2018 Mar 9.
5. Okech JE, Pimpleton AM, Vannatta R, Champe J. Intercultural communication: An application to group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 2015 Jul 3;40(3):268-93.
6. Greenaway KH, Wright RG, Willingham J, Reynolds KJ, Haslam SA. Shared identity is key to effective communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2015 Feb;41(2):171-82.
7. Kozlowski SW. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams: A reflection. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2018 Mar;13(2):205-12.
8. Kozlowski SW, Grand JA, Baard SK, Pearce M. Teams, teamwork, and team effectiveness: Implications for human systems integration.
9. Guchait P, Lei P, Tews MJ. Making teamwork work: Team knowledge for team effectiveness. The Journal of psychology. 2016 Apr 2;150(3):300-17.
10. McEwan D, Ruissen GR, Eys MA, Zumbo BD, Beauchamp MR. The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PloS one. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169604.
11. Tannenbaum SI, Traylor AM, Thomas EJ, Salas E. Managing teamwork in the face of pandemic: evidence-based tips. BMJ quality & safety. 2021 Jan 1;30(1):59-63.
12. Amir O, Grosz BJ, Gajos KZ, Swenson SM, Sanders LM. From care plans to care coordination: Opportunities for computer support of teamwork in complex healthcare. InProceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems 2015 Apr 18 (pp. 1419-1428).
13. Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Importance of teamwork, communication and culture on failure-to-rescue in the elderly. Journal of British Surgery. 2016 Jan;103(2):e47-51.
14. Mesmer-Magnus J, Niler AA, Plummer G, Larson LE, DeChurch LA. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A continuation. Career Development International. 2017 Sep 11.
15. Chowdhury T, Murzi H. Literature review: Exploring teamwork in engineering education. InProceedings of the Conference: Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Cape Town, South Africa 2019 Jul (pp. 10-12).
16. McEwan D, Ruissen GR, Eys MA, Zumbo BD, Beauchamp MR. The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PloS one. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169604.