Analyzing The Complexity Of Lewis And Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project In An Essay.

Analyse the task for keywords. Keywords are the words that identify the topic or issue.You’ll use keywords when you research for information.

• What is the topic? Can you explain it in one statement?
• Ask yourself questions about the topic. This helps you analyse the topic and start problem solving.
• Test that you understand the question by rewriting it in your own words.
• Once you have an overall understanding of the question, you should take a position. It can be a tentative position; you might change your mind as you find out more about the topic. With a position on the issue you can focus your research on more detailed texts.
2. 1. 3 Break the question down into meaningful pieces
• When you break down the assignment question into a series of questions, it helps you to work out the content you will need for each section. You can then decide what you need to research and read.

In recent years, many New Zealand tourist operators have been using the “eco” label to market their ventures, claiming responsible environmental and conservation practices. However, there is some argument over whether such claims can be justified. Discuss the current debate involving New Zealand’s ecotourism industry. What role, if any, should government play in respect to ecotourism? Is there a role for the tourism industry itself.
o Instruction word/s – “Discuss”
o Focus – Claims made by ecotourism operators. Counter claims by opponents. Two sides to the debate – whose side does the evidence support? Should the government play a role? Should the tourism industry be involved?
o Range & boundaries – Ecotourism. New Zealand. Central government?

Local government? Regional councils? Tourism industry.State To give the main features, in very clear English (almost like a simple list but written in full sentences).Summaries To give a concise account of the main points only, omitting details or examples.
2. 1. 4 Discuss your interpretation of the question.
• Talk to your classmates and test your understanding of the task with them.
• Check vocabulary, facts and concepts if you need to.
• Ask your lecturer/tutor if you’re still not clear.

Design Structure Matrix of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The successful management of the complex projects has been largely dependent on the continuation of the works and the formation of the successful implication management. The major requirements of the complex project includes fundamental changes in the existing processes of the project.

The complex project managers are responsible for the ultimately optimizing of the resource availability and technical performance. The following assignment had been developed on the case study of Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project, which is a complex project. The completion of the report would help in understanding the complexity level of the project using the design structure matrix (DSM), identification of the constraints and limitation of the project, and tools helpful for management of the varieties of the project.

Design structure matrix of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The design structure matrix (DSM) is a tool helpful for evaluating the complexity of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project. The tool utilizes the task dependencies and using the dependence factor it maps complexity level. The relationship between the complexities of the project can be understood as given in the matrix below,

According to the DSM made for the bridge replacement project, the analysis had resulted in identifying that the project delivery method selection and safety and modulation is the most important of all. These two have importance for all the activities of the project considering that the bridge is the final deliverable and its safety development is a crucial aspect. The compilation of the work would be effectively done for constructing the bridge and repairing it. The addressing to the public needs is also important as the construction process might result in traffic issues. Hence, the project should be done in the least possible time, considering the safety factors, and quality of the bridge must be improved.

Peer review Information

Many contractor, project managers, and construction company’s owners should be reviewed while developing the construction of the bridge. The information would provide the option for the grading of the complexities and the formation of the smart information development. The list of the people who helped in providing information for evaluation of the DSM are given below,

Constraints and Limitation of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project involves the construction of the bridge using complex project management concepts and principles. However, the construction of the bridge is not a simple work and it requires the involvement of the work depicted with innovation for adjusting the construction of the works. The constraints and limitations for the project include huge work load, disruption in traffic, treaty between two cities, lack of design build procurement, and cost of work.

Peer review Information

Explanation of the Constraints and Limitation

The following are the constraints and limitations of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project,

Reason for varieties in the Project

The major reasons for the varieties of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project include,

Complexity Issues: The project involved the construction of the 5478 feet long bridge between the two cities and hence it comprises of site clearing, safety considerations, and information alignment.

Cost Variance Issues: The issues of cost variance is another major factor resulting in issues to the completion of the project. The variance of the cost is based on any requirement change or resource price hike.

Schedule Issues: The completion of the project in tight schedule as the longer project runs, the longer it would impact the transportation on the bridge would also bring about issues in completion of the work.

Tools helpful for Absorption of varieties

The tools helpful for the absorption of the varieties of Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project are,

Incentive Provision: the incentive provision with the bid packages would be helpful for cost controlling and scheduling during the planning and implementation activities.  

Utilization of SPMT: The SPMT would be helpful for transporting the new deck panel from the fabrication site to bridge by inclusion of new technologies.

Communication Plan: Communication plan allowed the sharing of the information and the deployment of the improve activities for the project team.

Graph of External affairs vs. recommended actions

Summary of the complexity of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project involves the construction of the bridge using complex project management concepts and principles. The project involved the construction of the 5478 feet long bridge between the two cities and hence it required huge amount of work and resources. The bridge allowed the travelling conveyance between Washington and Oregon and on an average of 21,000 vehicles per day use the bridge for traveling. The design bid build procurement was used as design build procurement was not available then.

Conclusion

However, the construction of the bridge was not a simple work and it requires the involvement of the work depicted with innovation for adjusting the construction of the works. The issues of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project were Schedule Issues, Complexity Issues, and Cost Issues. The use of Incentive Provision, Utilization of SPMT, and Communication Plan had been helpful for developing effective understanding of the works.

Browning, T. R. (2014). Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 229-241.

Browning, T. R. (2016). Design structure matrix extensions and innovations: a survey and new opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(1), 27-52.

Cooke-Davies, T. (2011, August). Aspects of complexity: Managing projects in a complex world. Project Management Institute.

Fisher, C. M., Pillemer, J., & Amabile, T. M. (2018). Deep help in complex project work: Guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1524-1553.

Jun, J. H. (2018). An abductive approach to Design Structure Matrix (DSM) partitioning using frequency domain scoring(Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Rose, K. H. (2012). Aspects of Complexity: Managing Projects in a Complex World. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 77-77.

Yao, X., Zhou, J., Li, Y., & Liu, E. (2016). An Enhanced Collaborative Optimization Approach with Design Structure Matrix Algorithms to Group and Decouple Multidisciplines. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016.