The International Series Of Monographs In Nuclear Energy Publishes Essay.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy

Discuss About The International Series Of Monographs In Nuclear Energy.

In today's world, human beings are chiefly dependent upon 3 sources of energy namely, renewable, non-renewable and nuclear energy. The chief sources of non-renewable sources of energy are coal, natural gas, oil, uranium and fossil fuels. The chief advantages of non-renewable source of energy are that they are abundant and affordable. However, usage of non-renewable source of energy has contributed to several environmental issues like air pollution and global warming (Zinkle and Was 2013). Apart from that, being a non-sustainable source, non-renewable source of energy is running out and cannot be replenished in a lifetime. Hence the concept of the renewable source of energy like solar energy, tidal energy and wind energy emerged to deal with the issues. Unlike, non-renewable source of energy, renewable sources of energy are sustainable but lack cost effectiveness and ability fulfil the high demand of global energy supply. These issues with non-renewable and renewable energy have enhanced the dependency on the nuclear energy sources. The Thesis statement of this essay is a dependency on nuclear power as an energy source is unavoidable. Being a sustainable energy source, nuclear energy is considered renewable energy. It eradicates the issues associated with renewable as well as non-renewable sources. For instance, unlike fossil fuels, no carbon emission occurs during energy generation from nuclear power plants. Another advantage of nuclear energy is the cost-effectiveness of this energy. However several issues can be encountered with the nuclear energy sources. There prevails a risk of massive accidents due to nuclear power point blast which imposes highly negative and prolonged impact on human beings. Moreover, the radioactive waste that is generated in the nuclear power plant is highly dangerous and often let off radiation if not disposed of correctly.

According to a group of researchers generation of nuclear energy often results in massive accidents that not only results in a huge loss of lives but also impose a prolonged impact on the residents of the country (Simmons 2013). Considering the fact that the generation of nuclear energy involves radioactive emissions, even the slightest negligence can result in massive destruction. In nuclear plant, energy is generated by controlled radioactive emission. However, an excessive amount of heating often results in melting down of nuclear reactors allowing more nuclear fuel elements to exceed its melting point. In the past, a good number of nuclear accidents has taken place in various countries and has imposed a highly negative impact on the residents of the countries. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster is a mention-worthy incident that happened in 2011 in Japan due to a nuclear meltdown. Apart from damage caused by explosion and fires, nuclear accidents result in radiation sickness caused due to radioactive emission (Jahn and Korolczuk 2012). Moreover, unlike other disasters, nuclear disaster impose a prolonged effect on the residents of the country that has the potential to change gene orientation which results in the birth of disabled infants.  Thus it can be concluded that nuclear energy is too risky to be a sustainable source of energy.

Potential for Accidents and Radioactive Waste

Conversely, it has been argued that nuclear energy can reduce global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Excessive emission of harmful gases from fossil fuels like CO2, SO2 and Nitric oxides are a major reason behind the increasing air pollution and global warming across the world. For instance, in spite of the fact that the United States holds less than 5 percent of the global population, the nation uses approximately 25 percent of the global supply of fossil fuels due to large houses and locomotives (Dresner 2018). According to a survey conducted in 2014, more 78 percent of US global warming emissions were energy-related emissions of carbon dioxide (Li et al.2014). Considering the fact that nuclear energy produces no harmful gasses, replacing non-renewable sources of energy with nuclear energy will significantly reduce the global warming. Moreover, unlike other renewable sources of energy, nuclear energy as cost-effective as a non-renewable source of energy. Thus, it can be concluded that nuclear energy should be used worldwide to prevent the further emission of harmful gases that cause global warming.

In spite of the fact that it has been argued, generation of nuclear energy is risky, the mentioned risks can be prevented by implementing effective technology and providing effective training to the staffs (Tang et al. 2012). In this era of technological advancement, several technologies are used by scientists to prevent nuclear blasts. Specials steps have been taken by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of US to prevent a crisis like loss of power, equipment failure, or inability to cool the reactor core. Countries like France and Germany where nuclear energy is considered to be the chief source of energy has evidence a significant reduction in the pollution rate. Apart from that, in order to protect the residents of countries from radioactive emission, nuclear plants are constructed far away from residential area.

Nuclear energy sources have the potential to generate energy without depending upon the natural aspects and are highly cost-effective. Other renewable energy sources like wind energy or solar energy are highly dependent on the wind flow and Sun respectively and hence can be used as a reliable source for mass production of energy (AlFarra and Abu-Hijleh 2012). This is because the hours of sun or wind do not always coincide with the hours with more energy demand. However, Nuclear energy, since it is produced from nuclear fission does not depend on any natural source. Not only that, the production cost of wind and solar energy is high due to low production. However, When it comes to nuclear fuel, less amount of fuel has the capability to produce a huge amount of energy. It represents a significant saving of raw materials, transport, handling, as well as extraction of the fuel. Thus it can be concluded that nuclear energy is more convenient than any other renewable source of energy.

Role in Reducing Global Warming

In contrary to the above argument, it can be said that nuclear energy results in radioactive waste which is highly dangerous and radioactive radiation impose a highly negative impact on the health of human beings. Radioactive wastes are defined as solid, liquid or gaseous elements that consist of radioactive substances and are produced during the generation of nuclear energy in the nuclear power plants (Murakami et al. 2015). A radioactive material is considered waste once it has spent 3 years in the reactor producing electricity and heat. These nuclear wastes contain radioactivity and if not disclosed properly can cause cancer to the local residents. Exposure to radioactive waste cause irreversible destruction of human cells and thus nuclear waste is fatal for human beings. Not only that, employees working in the nuclear power plants bear the risk of cancer due to constant exposure in front of radioactive substances (Cicia et al. 2012). However, other renewable sources of energy that includes tidal, wind and solar energy, are devoid of such hazardous factors and thus can be considered as sustainable sources of energy.  

However, in recent years several steps have been taken to ensure the safety of employees working in a nuclear power plant. A high tech uniform that has the potential to prevent the penetration of alpha, beta and even the gamma rays into the body has been designed for the nuclear plant workers (AlFarra and Abu-Hijleh 2012). Not only that, employees are provided with effective training in order to ensure that they have developed enough skills to handle nuclear radiators. Apart from this, high security has been implemented by the government in order to prevent any sudden terrorist activities near the nuclear power plant.  Not only that, nowadays, radioactive wastes are stored deep inside the earth in a locked lead container in order to prevent health issues of local residents due to radioactive emission.

While non-renewable energy involves increasing air population and global warming, these energy sources cannot be substituted by solar or wind energy due to their inefficiency in fulfilling the current huge demand for electricity. Thus, it can be concluded that nuclear energy, if efficiently used can definitely act as a sustainable source of energy.

Reference List

AlFarra, H.J. and Abu-Hijleh, B., 2012. The potential role of nuclear energy in mitigating CO2 emissions in the United Arab Emirates. Energy Policy, 42, pp.272-285.

Cicia, G., Cembalo, L., Del Giudice, T. and Palladino, A., 2012. Fossil energy versus nuclear, wind, solar and agricultural biomass: Insights from an Italian national survey. Energy Policy, 42, pp.59-66.

Dresner, L., 2018. Resonance Absorption in Nuclear Reactors: International Series of Monographs on Nuclear Energy (Vol. 4). Elsevier.

Jahn, D. and Korolczuk, S., 2012. German exceptionalism: the end of nuclear energy in Germany!. Environmental Politics, 21(1), pp.159-164.

Li, B.A., Ramos, À., Verde, G. and Vidaña, I., 2014. The topical issue on nuclear symmetry energy.

Murakami, K., Ida, T., Tanaka, M. and Friedman, L., 2015. Consumers' willingness to pay for renewable and nuclear energy: A comparative analysis between the US and Japan. Energy Economics, 50, pp.178-189.

Simmons, J.H.W., 2013. Radiation damage in graphite: international series of monographs in nuclear energy (Vol. 102). Elsevier.

Tang, L., Yu, L., Wang, S., Li, J. and Wang, S., 2012. A novel hybrid ensemble learning paradigm for nuclear energy consumption forecasting. Applied Energy, 93, pp.432-443.

Zinkle, S.J. and Was, G.S., 2013. Materials challenges in nuclear energy. Acta Materialia, 61(3), pp.735-758.