Prevention And Control Of Dust Explosion: Causes And Techniques

Causes of Dust Explosion

Question:

Discuss about the Prevention And Control Of Dust Explosions.

The fast detonation of minute particles hovering in the atmosphere often but not present always in encompassed place is dust explosion. It can take place where the presence of any isolated powdered explosive material is in higher concentrations in the environment or other gaseous means, which are oxidized. Dust explosions are a common hazard in grain elevators, in coalmines and other industrial territories. It can be differentiated as primary and secondary in nature. The dust explosions, which are primary, may happen within the equipments of process or same enclosure. These are constrained by pressure release during purpose-made ducting to outer environment. The dust explosions, which are secondary, are the outcome of dust accretion inside a construction being disturbed and aroused by the primary outburst which results in more hazardous unrestrained detonation within the place of work (Sattar et al. 2014). There are five necessary conditions for a dust explosion- an explosive dust, an explosion source, an oxidant, dust is hovered in the air at an adequate high concentration and the area is compacted. Dust explosion can cause severe destruction to tools, structures and employees from violent overpressure or trembling effects. Flying items and wreckage can also cause additional damage. The sudden diminution of oxygen causes asphyxiation in a tight encircled space. This essay describes about the prevention and control of dust explosion.

Dust explosion generally stays from one to a few seconds after explosion and it takes place within a limited volume because ignition occurs so swiftly that the investigation information tends to focus only on post explosive observations. A study of losses due to dust explosion experienced by companies warranted by Factory Mutual and its subsidiaries during 1983 until 2006 supplies some insight into the loss trends of explosions related to dust (Addai, Gabel and Krause 2015). There were 166 dust ignitions, which resulted in $284 million in loss of property during that period of time (Addai, Gabel and Krause 2015). Woodworking experienced the highest number of losses (38.5 percent) which is followed by food processing (15.6 percent) and metal processing (10.8 percent) out of those 166 incidents and these three industries jointly report 65 percent of the incidents and the rest 35 percent of dust explosions extended out among nine other industries (Addai, Gabel and Krause 2015). The dust collectors are the important piece of equipment to experience ignition so far accounting almost 40percent of the incidents (Addai, Gabel and Krause 2015). There are several reasons among which the first reason is that the dust collector deals with dust, which is always suspended, in air (Kadri, Birregah and Chatelet 2014). The second reason is these systems are designed to handle equipments that are produced somewhere else and the source of ignition may be secluded from the dust collector (Kadri, Birregah and Chatelet 2014).

Prevention Techniques

There are several causes of dust explosion which includes smoldering nests, hot surfaces, and electrostatic discharges between two metal electrodes, burning particles, electrical apparatus and other sources (Yuan et al. 2015). Smoldering nests are formed from heat caused by friction such as cutting, by the accumulation of powder, by heating which is linked with searing work on tools and canals that contains dust deposits and by sources of heat that are small. There is a possibility for the ignition of dust explosion if the smoldering nests are uncovered to explosive dust cloud in an enclosed space. According to the tabulation chart of ignition sources implicated in 426 German dust explosions from the year 1965 to 1985 written by Eckhoff point out that smoldering nests were the most ubiquitous cause of dust explosions in silos (28percent), dryers (29percent) and the ignition source which is used as second most recurrent source in dust collector explosions (11percent) (Eckhoff 2013). According to reports, smoldering nests were bad sources of ignition for dust clouds while flaming nests caused ignition more rapidly (Fabiano et al. 2014). Krause presents a numerical method and Hensel through which non-steady fields of temperature can be calculated (Murillo et al. 2013). The temperature that is responsible for the hot surface explosion of dust cloud has been considered as universal constant for a specific cloud in past. It is to be noted that hot surface detonation temperature of dust clouds which are so minimal that it differ drastically with scale all along with the dimension of hot surface related to dirt cloud. Both distinguished basic understanding and distinguished testing approach are needed. There are certain materials that are susceptible to heating itself and can direct to impulsive blast-off. The principal chemical reaction is the reaction, which is oxidized in low level, and the materials which can self heat by oxidation at low temperature are ABS resin fine particles as well as activated carbon and other substance intermediates (Hedlund, Astad and Nichols 2014). It is to be notified that the electrostatic release between two metal conductors that are used to create contact of electricity with few parts of circuit can be created through various customs such as by release of static electricity, failures in electric circuits and in switch. Echkoff has discussed about the impact of dust distinction on MIE of Ferro combination dust (Holbrow 2013). The distinction of dust was individualized only as a mass proportion better than a random mass in the past, which complicated the analysis of experimental data that was published and research, is required which will be more systematic to elucidate the précised influence of particular size. Lorenz and Schiebler investigated the development of temperature as well as pressure in the spark channel for the duration of its configuration as well as its expansion (Xu et al. 2013). The thermal radiation that helps in cooling canals and the reliable capability of a certain released electrical energy sets fire a dirt cloud on material glint features, which were highlighted, is also included. Impact spark is a complicated process, which means the explosion of dirt clouds by minute smoldering metal elements. These sparkles are induced with the help of fast collision between solid equipments amongst which one is metal. There are various theories, which describe both impact and ignition, and such theories include various intricate sub processes. The first is the creation along with the fast warming up of the metal element with the help of collision whereas the subsequent one is the explosion of the rapid warm element along with succeeding burning process and thirdly it is the heat transmission of the dust cloud which in due course identifies whether explosion happens or not (Mittal 2013). According to the experiment done by Proust the least laser ray power needed for exploding dust clouds with the help of heat is absorbed by a firm target heated with the help of laser ray (Rademaeker et al. 2014). Numerous workers including Wolanski and Klemens studied instigation of dust ignition by shock waves (Mannan 2013).

Control Techniques

The application of full confinement is restricted because of expensive equipments. Yet, the technique is used in a few unique cases such as when dust becomes extremely poisonous and entirely dependable, detention is entirely necessary while present experimental techniques permit perfect prediction of utmost achievable ignition pressures in plain containers with point resource explosion, plan of pressure defiant process tools maybe complicated. The usage of finite element calculation method seems to be increased to achieve improvised design. The purpose of ignition seclusion is avoiding dirt detonation from scattering from prime ignition position towards further procedure units. The fundamental understanding of blaze transmission and stress build-up in interrelated vessels is needed for arrangement of presentation criteria of a number of types of active and passive division tools. Holbrow presented rational quantitative direction for the design of consistent method tools based on restraint and explosion venting from similar experiments in the UK (Holbrow 2013). Partial inerting is comparatively a fresh conception for extenuating dust detonation. The diminution of oxygen in the atmosphere decreases both explosion reactivity and ignition rate of dust cloud. The explosion risk can be reduced with the help of fair reduction of the content of oxygen. Explosion releasing is the most broadly used process for extenuating dust ignition. The improvised edition of VDI and NFPA guiding principles for sizing of dirt ignition events are presented by Tamanini and Valiulis (Rockwell and Rangwala 2013). Several techniques were developed for removing harmful effects of combustion from releasing aperture. Ural and Lunn have studied the impact of escape ducts on the utmost pressure of explosion in the discharged container (Rockwell and Rangwala 2013). Automatic explosion repression is the active technique for dust detonation alleviation, which is relatively complex and costly. This method is used generally when simpler as well as cheaper methods are insufficient. Tyldesley reported that superheated water can be an effectual applicant in some circumstances and Moore as well as Chatrathi and Going assessed the appropriateness of different suppressants (Russo et al. 2013). Moore and Siwek encapsulated their wide-ranging multilayer trial work on control of dust ignitions while Chatrathi and Going presented an abstract of present knowledge along with philosophy for executing usual ignition control systems (Russo et al. 2013). Brehm studied the power of eminent primary temperature of ignition dust cloud on the efficiency of a usual ignition repression system (Rademaeker et al. 2014). CEN, the European standardization association has created an outline set for plan of ignition repression systems, which appears to introduce better elasticity than the conventional approach. Therefore, it can be said that if the turmoil stage of homogeneous state of the cloud of a particular dust in existent process situation decreases than those which are created with the help of conventional usual VDI-technique of generation of dirt cloud it might be considered as the plan of the repression proposal.

Workplace can eliminate one or more elements from fuel, ignition source, air, confinement and dispersion to prevent dust explosions and can consider certain control measures such as removing combustible dusts, providing controls to minimize the threat, providing additional controls to diminish the consequences (Xu et al. 2013). The threat of dust explosion can be eliminated if the amount of dust present is adequately less. Several control measures for dust explosion includes dust control, control of ignition, explosion relief and venting, training and awareness and personal protective equipment. Well-made and well-maintained Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV) systems can confine dusts efficiently to avoid needless diffusion of explosive dusts in workplace. LEV systems can be executed at suitable places, which cause blazing materials to extend an outburst within the LEV system. The implementation of appropriate housekeeping and safeguarding programs for dust collection systems and filters can control dust explosion. Sweeping tends to cause more scattering of dust particles so vacuuming or wet cleaning methods are preferable in workplaces. The usage of appropriate flame-resistant tools or non-sparking equipments in areas handling explosive powders can help in ignition control. Involuntarily discharged effectual bonding and powder grounding management units can be cause of explosion to thwart the amassing of electrostatic charges. Therefore, usual continuity testing should be executed to make certain the helpfulness of bonding and grounding. Ignition relief escapes should be located away from work areas or pathways to protect persons at work; detectors for sparks or glowing materials like grinders, LEV ducting should be installed. The areas that handle combustible dusts should be separated from other parts of the workplace and should be secluded with obstructions such as blocks, puzzles along with isolation regulators. Training in addition to refresher lessons should be provided on explosive dust hazards and its control to those persons who are involved in work with explosive dirt. The combustible dust hazards and its physical properties should be conversed clearly and safe management practices and precautions should be taken to control dust explosion. Personal protective equipment (PPE) should be provided to the workers who work with explosive dusts such as static dissipative safety shoes, clothes that are fire retardant. Workplaces can also refer to UK Health and Safety Executive’s Guide on Safe Handling of Combustible Dusts. They can refer to the NFPA 654 and Standard for the Prevention of Fire and dust Explosions from the manufacturing, processing and handling of combustible particulate solids and WSH Council’s Workplace Safety and Health Guidelines on flammable materials should be given to the workers as well (Russo et al. 2013).

It is to be concluded that dust explosion should be prevented and controlling measures should be taken by people in order to eliminate the hazards of dust explosions. Dust explosions can affect industries, workplaces, coalmines and other locations because an explosion source, an oxidant, or an explosive dust causes it. It causes tremendous destruction to equipments, employees who are working in coalmines and other workplaces. It has been studied that several industries has suffered a huge loss due to dust explosion. There are certain control measures to eliminate dust explosion such as ignition control, control of dust, relief and venting of explosion and providing training and awareness to the workers in workplaces.

References

Abuswer, M., Amyotte, P., Khan, F. and Morrison, L., 2013. An optimal level of dust explosion risk management: framework and application. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), pp.1530-1541.

Addai, E.K., Gabel, D. and Krause, U., 2015. Explosion characteristics of three component hybrid mixtures. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 98, pp.72-81.

De Rademaeker, E., Suter, G., Pasman, H.J. and Fabiano, B., 2014. A review of the past, present and future of the European loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(4), pp.280-291.

Eckhoff, R.K., 2013. Influence of dispersibility and coagulation on the dust explosion risk presented by powders consisting of nm-particles. Powder technology, 239, pp.223-230.

Fabiano, B., Currò, F., Reverberi, A.P. and Palazzi, E., 2014. Coal dust emissions: from environmental control to risk minimization by underground transport. An applicative case-study. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(2), pp.150-159.

Hedlund, F.H., Astad, J. and Nichols, J., 2014. Inherent hazards, poor reporting and limited learning in the solid biomass energy sector: A case study of a wheel loader igniting wood dust, leading to fatal explosion at wood pellet manufacturer. Biomass and bioenergy, 66, pp.450-459.

Holbrow, P., 2013. Dust explosion venting of small vessels and flameless venting. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 91(3), pp.183-190.

Kadri, F., Birregah, B. and Châtelet, E., 2014. The impact of natural disasters on critical infrastructures: a domino effect-based study. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 11(2), pp.217-241.

Mannan, S., 2013. Lees' Process Safety Essentials: Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Mittal, M., 2013. Limiting oxygen concentration for coal dusts for explosion hazard analysis and safety. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 26(6), pp.1106-1112.

Murillo, O.C., López, O., Perrin, L., Vignes, A. and Muñoz, F., 2013. CFD modelling of nanoparticles dispersion in a dust explosion apparatus. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 31.

Rockwell, S.R. and Rangwala, A.S., 2013. Influence of coal dust on premixed turbulent methane–air flames. Combustion and Flame, 160(3), pp.635-640.

Russo, P., Amyotte, P.R., Khan, F.I. and Di Benedetto, A., 2013. Modelling of the effect of size on flocculent dust explosions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), pp.1634-1638.

Sattar, H., Andrews, G.E., Phylaktou, H.N. and Gibbs, B.M., 2014. Turbulent Flames Speeds and Laminar Burning Velocities of Dusts using the ISO 1 m³ Dust Explosion Method. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 36, pp.157-162.

Xu, H., Li, Y., Zhu, P., Wang, X. and Zhang, H., 2013. Experimental study on the mitigation via an ultra-fine water mist of methane/coal dust mixture explosions in the presence of obstacles. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(4), pp.815-820.

Yuan, Z., Khakzad, N., Khan, F. and Amyotte, P., 2015. Dust explosions: A threat to the process industries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 98, pp.57-71.