Understanding The Importance Of Philosophy: Developing Critical Thinking And Gaining Knowledge In An Essay.

Developing Critical Thinking Through Philosophy

Discuss About The Understanding The Importance Of Philosophy.

Our essay writing help, philosophy helps in developing the skills of critical thinking. The other subjects like economics, history and physics are primarily essential to provide various specific knowledge. Nonetheless, some others are more practical in nature like computer engineering. They are primarily helpful to provide with skills. It is thought by some scholars that automatically philosophy is helpful to develop critical thinking as the byproducts. The skills of critical thinking are largely related to logic, which is a philosophical domain and the analysis of proper reasoning. Though it helps to develop such thinking, however, people also need to reason properly. This has been a hard sell since people have known a minimum about logic. They think the same as those who understand quire bit to thank the cognitive bias called the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Again, it is a smart method to understand particular elements. It is seen that the philosophers understand various philosophical concerns, history of different philosophical debates and some bit regarding what is meant to make reason properly. They have been tending to understand more about these aspects than those who have never been the philosophers. It is the cause why one can understand lots from the philosophers regarding the different specializations. For instance all the people know the thing about logic is that it is nevertheless a proper way to argue in the way – “Rocks exists, hence, the whales are not fishes”. This is also an indisputable fact that philosophers understand the logic in precise ways for making progress. It is agreed by natural scientists that one can make reason properly that one can evaluate nothing regarding proper and improper types of reasoning. Logic is developed by the philosophers in restraining how natural sciences can be performed. Further, one know that some individuals have known much regarding logic than other people like that proved by the Dunning-Kruger effect. As far the scientific investigation done by Tin Van Gelder, the study from the cognitive science is that as one needs the students in substantially developing the skills, one must at any point help to develop theoretical understandings as the complements to vital hand-on practical knowledge. Moreover, theoretical understanding is logical notions regarding how they could be implemented properly. This includes informal errors for reasoning, valid reasoning, argument forms and identification of premise. Here, one vital question lies in the fact that the kind of knowledge that can be offered to us by philosophy. Here, for instance, it has been like the knowledge of natural scientists to provide us and is primarily the knowledge of logical implications and concepts.

Philosophy and Factual Knowledge

Next, philosophy is important to derive the factual type of knowledge. It is a type of knowledge that good natural science has provided to us. This comprises of the knowledge related to casual relations, laws of nature and the things existing in the world. These are the types of things in which biologists, chemists and physicists are interested in. Nonetheless, it has not been totally clear what type of entities has the science been providing regarding the factual knowledge. A debate has been there on what type of scientific entities that been existing like electrons. The philosophers have been debating on how one must respond to this query.  People thinking about those invisible entities of theory like electrons are the scientific realists and those who never thing so are referred to as anti-realists. Furthermore, some scholars also think that moral facts are also there. These are facts about mathematics or facts about logics. Here, the philosophers have been thinking to help to decide whether one must believe in those facts existing. Thus they are realists of those type of things. In such kind of situations, one must be believing about them. Here, these re never the kind of facts that the scientists are studying. Rather the philosophers are helpful here to attain the factual data regarding those things. This is in view of the fact that the realities about mathematics and logic are particularly promising since the scientists never need to presuppose that particular mathematics and logical facts have been there. These can be discovered and here the scientific observations have been mistaken as one contradicts with those realities. Moreover, for instance, the logicians have been unanimously agreeing with principles related to non-contradictions. This states that the statement can be true and also be false simultaneously. As one of the statements are true, then every statement contradicting the first one are false. At many times observation is there contradicting the scientific theory to be believed to be proven. It is at any point that Mercury never revolves across the Sun as predicted by Newton’s theory in the field of physics. It can be said that the understanding of the observation has been wrong. Otherwise, the theory has been not right. Moreover, there is a challenge as anyone say that both the theory and observation are true. Then there is the issue that scientists can reveal that the contradictory observations can prove the principles of the non-contradictions to be the wrong one. Few individuals have been arguing the philosophy is never meant to be provided as the knowledge of facts.  Moreover, this is a common thought that philosophy has been inherently always unresolvable. Here, the philosophers have been debating in an endless manner despite any expectation to provide the ultimate answer. Again, at many times it is also said that there are no suitable answers. This is perhaps in the sense that multiple distinct answers are there that can be defended rationally. One must here wonder that as the same is true for science also. Science, perhaps must move constantly to undertake progress in an endless manner and seek the answers to provides to continue to get refined despite providing any ultimate answer.

Philosophy and Conceptual Knowledge

Though many scholars are been sympathetic to the view that the philosophy is able to give factual data, philosophy has needed to provide the ultimate response to make progress or become informative. Again, a huge deal of the factual philosophy has seemed to deliver knowledge regarding what has not been the case. At many times, one can eradicate the belief of phisosphical theory same as how the scientists can remove the hypothesis that is failed. At this case, for instance one can eradicate the belief that every conclusion is been true.

Then philosophy is useful to retrieve conceptual knowledge. Many individuals think that philosophy has been meant for providing factual data can agree that it can be informative. The philosophers comprise of the kind of expertise and often reveal that the philosophy is regarding the certification is ideas and seeking logical implications. Some philosophers, for instance, are the compatibilists to think that one can have the free will. It is despite that fact that the world is deterministic in nature. They never think of the notion that there has been logical implication making the world with both the things impossible. His is based on the ideas of determinism and free will. Apart from this, compatibilism has not been stating what we actually have been free will and the world has been deterministic. This is the view that what can be a case of the globe instead of what actually has been the case.

Further, one vital question is that s the conceptual knowledge has been distinct from the factual type of knowledge. It is thought by some philosophers that none can tell about anything regarding the world. However, one can provide the conceptual knowledge of the kind that is demonstrated above. It is never thought that conceptual knowledge has been factual. Besides, some have also hesitated also to call that a conceptual knowledge since they never think philosophy about creating knowledge. Nonetheless, some have thought that the conceptual knowledge has also been factual. Perhaps the understanding, for example, has been the analysis of particular moral concepts. This is sufficient to know that it causes pain only for fun has been wrong. Here, one purpose of this type of knowledge is the make several clarifications and then avoid sloppy thinking. However, another reason helpful is to know what beliefs can be rejected. This is same as the though how philosophy can provide factual knowledge. In this case, as compatibilism is true, one must reject the incompatibilism. This view is absent in the deterministic world. Though many are unconvinced that philosophy is vital, one thinks there are effective causes to think that it is vital. It is also useful to develop skills of critical thinking. However, one can help in providing the knowledge of logic greatly helpful for developing it. Further, one can seek the view that philosophy has not been making any progress and providing with any knowledge that is plausible and on the basis of the fact to be clear that anyone understands anything about the minimum philosophical domain of logic. Here, it is also seen that there are always some people who have been carrying more amount of knowledge regarding that specific domain than the others.