XYZ Energy For Organizational Change Models: An Essay.

Discuss abut the XYZ Energy for Organizational Change Models.

Organizational behavior is the study that explores and scrutinizes the structure of the organization that has an impact on the behavior of staff within the organization (Gl?veanu 2008).  Adhikari (2003) defines organizational behavior as the study that examines the behavior of a person or group of persons within an organization. The study assists to examine and analyze the emotions, attitudes towards work, job satisfaction, motivation of employees (Adhikari, 2003)  The acquisition of the larger company Big Energy to smaller company XYZ Energy caused many issues. This study purposes to understand the impact of the acquisition by evaluating the various issues faced by the staff pertaining values, behavior and attitude.

Values are beliefs held and under one’s control. Values vary from one organization to another and also from one individual to another. Values are the crucial foundation of every business organization whether the organization is aware of it or not (Middleton 2002). A company’s values are what is important to that company, what the company strives to accomplish every day. In most cases, the values tend to revolve around how the company interacts with the customers and employees. Through this interaction, the business is able to motivate or influence behavior and highlight how each employee should approach the work ethos (Biswas 2009).

The two companies Big Energy and XYZ companies did not blend or complement between the employees and supervisors that consequently impacted the interpersonal relationships and ultimately influenced the managerial effectiveness. The assimilation of the organizations severely affected the employees as their advancement and growth was at stake and therefore their morale was at its lowest. Therefore, when Sally Johnson intervened seeking a solution by arguing to the senior management to reconsider their decision to integrate Big Energy, was pointless because the employees had already started to leave. Big Energy management was unable to effectively manage the integration process causing the employees of XYZ Energy to resign yet they had contributed immensely to the growth of XYZ enabling it to reach where it was today.

Organizational culture is another crucial aspect in the growth and expansion of an organization (Schermerhorn et. al. 2000). The culture helps the managers and administrators of an organization to determine who to employ by hiring a suitable person to fit well within the criteria and standards in accordance with the organization policy (Ujjainia, n.d.). Culture will require the employees new or old to fit into the ways and methods of the organization. The organization will be looking at people with similar values and those who will fit in well to the environment of the organization. For example, if the company’s core value revolves around particular religious beliefs such as Muslim, it is highly unlikely that the organization will employ a Christian or Indian in the organization.

Organizational Culture

Organizational behavior significantly depends on the organizational culture (Schermerhorn et. al. 2000). A corporate or organizational culture depends largely on the behavior of the organization. XYZ Energy had a culture that can be matched with Schein’s behavior model that puts emphasis on three main aspects of an organizational culture. The case study reveals that XYZ company had its own culture which the staff had adapted. The management team seemed to work well with staff members who outwardly showed their respect to them. The relationship between the leaders and staff was more of democratic rather than autocratic. The employees contributions were respected too and appreciated which can be depicted in the Schein’s behavior model.

According to Edgar Schein, an organization culture is created with time not within one day. Employees undergo changes including adapting to the external environment and hurdles, including solving issues. These experiences enable the employees to form practices that are repeated day by day thus creating or forming the organization culture. The new employees also adapt to the organization culture and work harmoniously without strain or stress (Robbins 2001). Schein believed that an organization culture had three levels.

Artifacts: this is the organizational characteristics that can be seen or identified easily  such as code of dress, mission and vision, office facilities and furniture and general behavior of employees.

Values: these are stated values, the attitude and thought process of the employees (El-Katsha 2002). XYZ were experts and professional in their job. They had a competition value that was based on merit but after the integration, the employees lost morale. McGregor’s Theory X and Y in which McGregor’s describes X and Y as two extremes where X naturally dislike their job and will take every opportunity to avoid it (Card et. al. 2011).  Theory Y on the other hand according to McGregor describes the motivation aspect of employees stating that employees can either work efficiently or dislike work depending on the conditions found at the work place. Work could either be a satisfaction or punishment source. After absorption and on seeing some employees leave the organization, Big Energy should have investigated to determine whether the XYZ employees were X kind of people or Y with regard to McGregor’s theory. Big Energy should then put in place ways to amend the situation so that the employees’ morale would improve.

Assumed values: these are behaviors that cannot be measured, implanted yet make a difference to the organization culture (Gordon 2003). Some facts and beliefs stay concealed but affect the organization culture. The deep human aspects for example, females in an organization do not believe in sitting in late while men would be comfortable with such an arrangement. The organization may well understand such practices and follow them though not spelt out or discussed openly but the employees understand them.

Models

The essential factor of any organization is human resource because they constitute the inner social system of the organization (Bottom and Kong 2010). The employees established the organization and without them an organization would not exist. Through them the organization is able to achieve its objectives. The human resource of an organization is a crucial factor that must not be ignored. After the integration, things have taken a twist, and the employees of XYZ feel demotivated. During acquisitions, cultures of both companies are blended to create an environment that can either strengthen or destabilize an organization (Ajzen 2011). Big Energy did not recognize the organization behavior of XYZ, or if they did, they did not care to blend with their company’s. The two companies are struggling to identify the model of the two companies, XYZ being most affected because the managers of Big Energy overlook their plight. The behavioral patterns can deeply affect the overall performance of the organization if not looked into earnestly. Big Energy should have brought positive influence to XYZ and assist the employees of XYZ to adopt the behaviors of the Big Company so that they could feel embraced into the new system thus working towards the betterment of the company’s future.

After some employees left the organization, Big Energy failed to look into the issue around their exit and to listen to their sentiments in a bid to rectify the problem with the remaining employees. The management did not exercise their conceptual skills thus ignoring the various models given by theorists on organizational behavior. In the acquisition, Big Energy only used competitive advantage to earn more profits. It was more concerned with the speed at which the company would be acquired than the quality of the acquisition. Thus, the process they used to integrate XYZ did not acquire the operation processes and systems which ended in demotivating the staff of the remaining organization.

Interdependence and organization of systems is essential for any organization to acquire employee job satisfaction and higher profits (Bailey, 2007).  Big Energy should enhance the morale of the employees by using managerial strategies. After integration, the morale of XYZ employees deteriorated, Big Energy should portray the correct behavior and high value system.  To achieve its goals, Big Energy should integrate the human resource with other resources to enable it achieve its goals. Big Energy, did not pay attention to human resource but only looked at the integration process. It should start by understanding the culture, structure and nature of XYZ and then take appropriate decisions (Hargreaves 2011). Some models that Big Energy should adopt in the integration process include:

Human Resources

System Model: this model core factor is trust and self-motivation thereafter assisting to improve the performance and results of employees in an organization (Harms 2008).  This model is ideal in the acquisition because employees will not wait to be supervised. Rather, they will work with zeal towards achieving the goals of the company.

Collegial Model: this model requires that employees and management work together supportively and accomplish their goals (Buelens 2011). Team work is encouraged in this model as everyone is geared towards achieving the goal thence will have the will, responsibility and energy towards work. Big Energy can adopt this Model.

Supportive Model: this model entirely depends on the managers or leaders who should support the juniors to achieve their goals. For example, Big Energy managers should have supported the XYZ remaining employees to perform better in their jobs.

Conclusion

The models outlined above will assist Big Energy to work towards a successful integration that will encourage employees of XYZ to remain in the company and perform their duties better. However, the challenge that will face Big Energy will be to choose the preferred model that will best suit the situation at hand. The company needs to mingle with the employees, discern and consider the best approach to adopt to attain best results (Hiriyappa 2009).

Reference List

ADHIKARI, H. (2003). Organizational Change Models, A Comparison. SSRN Journal.

AJZEN, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections.Psychology and health, 26(9), 1113-1127.

BAILEY, C. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Pine Forge Press.

BISWAS, S. (2009). Impact of Interaction between Organizational Culture and Organizational Structure on HR Practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 5(2), pp.102-108.

BUELENS, M. (2011). Organisational Behaviour. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

CARD, D. AND GIULIANO, L. (2011). Peer effects and multiple equilibria in the risky behavior of friends. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.

EL-KATSHA, S. and WATTS, S. (2002). Gender, behavior, and health. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.

GL?VEANU, V. (2008). Research Methods in Social Psychology, A Comparative Analysis. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 4(1).

GORDON, J. (2003). Pfeiffer’s classic activities for developing leaders. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

HARGREAVES, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture,11(1), 79-99.

HIRIYAPPA, B. (2009). Organizational behavior. New Delhi: New Age International.

MIDDLETON, J. (2002). Organizational behavior. Oxford, U.K, Capstone Pub.

ROBBINS, S. (2001). Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

UJJAINIA, G. (n.d.). Personality, Attitude, Power and Politics Affecting Organisational Behavior. SSRN Journal.