Application Of Practice Development For Evaluating Person-Centered Care

Discuss about the use of a practice development evaluation process or tool. The process or tool will be chosen to evaluate either a current project or issue or a project or issue they have previously experienced.

In the current nursing profession, a majority of health practitioners are applying the methodology of Practice development to evaluate various health care programs. The area of Person-Centered Care requires the application of Practice Development to make it a success. When properly applied, the developmental approach ensures that Person-Centered Care satisfies the expectations of health workers, patients, and family members. Practice Development refers to the routine of creating a Person-Centered Care habit among everyone involved (Blais, 2015). Health practitioners frequently involve health care teams and individual patients in getting knowledge and skills on the development (Thomas, 2015). Stakeholder discussions on the topic result into a more realistic approach (Keating, 2014). The success of Person-Centered Care depends on routine practice (Oermann and Gaberson, 2016). This paper looks at the application of Practice development to evaluate Person-Centered Care. Moreover, the article looks at the action plan required to make the model of Care a reality.

Person-Centered Care remains a novelty to a majority of physicians today. However, it is imperative for health providers to evaluate the key issues revolving around the model. Moreover, a practical approach is the best mode of evaluation (Usworth, et al., 2016). Person-Centered care refers to a model of healthcare, which relies on the partnership of patients, clinicians, relatives of the patients and health care guidelines. The model can only work smoothly, if all the stakeholders build friendly working collaborations. According to the belief of Practice Development, mere working partnership is insufficient (Streiner, Norman and Cairney, 2015). Instead, the cultures and doctrines of patients should assume the first priority. Secondly, the patients and the physicians should observe long lasting compassion towards each other. Thirdly, everyone should be able to understand each others’ situation (Lynch, et al., 2018). Therefore, for Person-Care to function seamlessly, Practice development must be a critical factor.

The doctrines of Practice Development conform to the definitions of key terms in Person-Centered Care. The terms are: person, personal focus, and the attitude of care towards patients. A person refers to a creature that is outstanding, genuine, and deserves recognition (Bayley, Chambers and Donovan, 2016). Furthermore, a person’s view should attract respect from the physicians and relatives. Personal focus is the habit of an individual to foster, lasting partnership with everyone (Billing and Halstead, 2015). Moreover, the individual maintains their own cultural beliefs (Broom, et al., 2017). Everyone should respect the stand of an individual on any pressing issue (Coffey, et al., 2015). Physicians should understand the definitions that constitute Person-Centered Care before going into the practice aspect.

Action Plan

Practice Development is a routine approach. Physicians should seamlessly practice Person-Centered Care for it to be a formality. The development approach agrees with Person-Centered Care on its four main pillars. The first pillar defines the basics of the health care process (Iwasiw, Goldenburg, and Andrusyszyn, 2014). The healthcare provider should be well-trained, dedicated to the job, properly understand themselves and have a proper background of communication skills. Additionally, the physician should have the knowledge of the cultural orientation of patients (Blais, 2015). The clinicians should honor the beliefs of patients (Bayley et al., 2016). Secondly is the site for health administration. A health facility should have varied skilled personnel to attend to different health issues (Billing and Halstead, 2015). The partnership between clinicians should be perfect. The hospital administration should provide health practitioners with the support needed to attend to patients. Person-Centered Care units should develop their pillars according to the suggestions on Practice Development.

Person-Centered looks at the last two pillars which are tenable in practice. The third pillar is the Person-Centered procedures. In developmental Practice, guidelines must exist to facilitate the Care model (Broom et al., 2017). The physician should respect the norms of patients. They should consult patients before commencing treatment and respecting patients’ decisions on modes of treatment (Coffey et al., 2015). Furthermore, clinicians should ensure that they provide globally recognized services. In the event that physicians practice the three pillars, they should expect the following results. Firstly, patients, physicians and relatives of the patients get satisfied with the centered approach (Iwasiw et al., 2014). Secondly, patients feel that their decision matter. Lastly, the three stakeholders develop a long lasting working relationship (Keating, 2014). Development practice dictates that, all the four pillars must come into play to have a successful Person-Centered Care.

Person-Centered Care is ineffective when it is not put into a developmental practice. However, coming up with an action plan to actualize the Practice Development is a difficult task. The difficulty arises due to the numerous activities involved. Furthermore, there are many components and partnerships that are essential for Practice Development (Lynch et al., 2018). Practice Development encompasses numerous essential approaches (Oermann and Gaberson, 2016). Additionally, there are other stakeholders apart from the patient, physician, and relatives’ axis. There are activities that reoccur as others demand a rewind of previous actions (Streiner et al., 2015). The ever recycling activities overburden stakeholders (Thomas, 2015). Unless they hold on, they cannot device a proper plan to actualize the model that focuses on patients (Unsworth et al., 2016).

Action plan for Practice Development is a procedural endeavor. The plan helps to emphasize on the steps of Practice Development. Furthermore, the procedures of Practice Development in a more elaborate manner. First and foremost, the patient, clinician, and family friend should understand and embrace the fundamental issues of Person-Centered Care (Blais, 2015). Stakeholders should understand the meaning of the terms: Person, attitude, and personal focus (Bayley et al., 2016). Secondly, the stakeholders should create a common overview of the patient focused care (Billing and Halstead, 2015). Moreover, all stakeholders should attend the same training from the beginning to the end (Broom et al., 2017). Patients and physicians should develop a common ground for examining the classes of Practice Development (Coffey et al., 2015). The plan for evaluating Practice Development on Person-Centered Care is a multi-disciplinary one.

There are more action plans apart from the ones described above. Stakeholders should come up with an elaborate method to carry out the Practice Development. After devising a suitable method, they should tie the methods to attainable actions (Iwasiw et al., 2014). A proper way of examining the mode of action is essential. The government should create a series of workshops to enable members of the public to understand the meaning and applications of a Person-Centered Care. Health care executives should expose their staff on the basics of Practice Development (Keating, 2014). Additionally, the trained personnel should train the patients and their relatives about the model care procedures (Lynch et al., 2018). The following paragraph elaborates a sample of an action plan.

First, the plan is to put Person-Centered Care into the perspective of Practice development. Stakeholders should find more resources about the patient focused care model. Afterwards, the physicians should train the patients on the basics of the care model (Unsworth et al., 2016). Furthermore, the government should organize for regular workshops to emphasize on the basics of the Person-Centered Care. When the steps of Practice Development evaluation receive full attention, Person-Centered Care becomes a success (Thomas, 2015). Practice Development is essential as it transforms Person-Centered Care from a theoretical basis to a reality (Streiner et al., 2015). Stakeholders should put into practice, only the conditions that everybody has accepted. Patients and physicians should look for relevant exposure on the topical issue (Oermann and Gaberson, 2016). An elaborate plan yield desirable results. Therefore, a proper implementation is a necessity.

Conclusion

For the implementation of Person-Centered Care to be a reality, an evaluation using Practice Development is of essence. Furthermore, an elaborate Action plan is necessary to actualize the health care model. Practice Development tools overly on the Person-Centered Care to evaluate the model. First of all, one should understand the meanings of fundamental terms such as person, personal focus, and attitude. Moreover, one should know the four major pillar of Person-Centered Care before evaluation can begin. An elaborate action plan should follow the evaluation process. Practice Development is interdisciplinary; hence, should involve all stakeholders. Additionally, the health fraternity should respect the decisions made by patients. Physicians, patients and their relatives should foster a good working relationship to ensure a successful process

References

Bayley, H., Chambers, R., and Donovan, C., 2016. The good mentoring toolkit for healthcare. CRC Press.

Blais, K., 2015. Professional nursing practice: Concepts and perspectives. Pearson.

Billings, D.M. and Halstead, J.A., 2015. Teaching in Nursing-E-Book: A Guide for Faculty. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Broom, M., Gardner, A., Kecskes, Z., and Kildea, S., 2017. The transition from an open?plan to a two?cot neonatal intensive care unit: a participatory action research approach. Journal of clinical nursing, 26(13-14), pp.1939-1948.

Coffey, S., Lindsay, G.M., Cochrane, M., Cummings, K., Macdonald, K., Mairs, S., Sproul, S., Bouchard, S., Lulat, Z., Salamat, N. and Bell, R., 2015. Making the grade through the front door: evaluation and innovation in a registered practical nurse to bachelor of science in nursing program. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(1), pp.32-38.

Iwasiw, C.L., Goldenberg, D. and Andrusyszyn, M.A., 2014. Curriculum development in nursing education. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Keating, S.B., 2014. Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing. Springer Publishing Company.

Lynch, B.M., McCance, T., McCormack, B. and Brown, D., 2018. The development of the Person?centred Situational Leadership Framework: Revealing the being of person?centredness in nursing homes. Journal of clinical nursing, 27(1-2), pp.427-440.

Oermann, M.H. and Gaberson, K.B., 2016. Evaluation and testing in nursing education. Springer Publishing Company.

Streiner, D.L., Norman, G.R. and Cairney, J., 2015. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, USA.

Thomas, P.A., 2015. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. JHU Press.

Unsworth, J., Melling, A., Tuffnell, C. and Allan, J., 2016. Improving performance amongst nursing students through the discovery of discrepancies during simulation. Nurse education in practice, 16(1), pp.47-53.