Analyzing The Implications Of Flexible Work Arrangements On Employer-Employee Relationship: A Discussion On Motivational Theories And Essay.

Discuss about the Corporate Social Responsibility or CEO Narcissism.

Implications of Flexible working Arrangements on Employer-Employee Relationships

The report helps in analyzing the different kinds of methods of motivating the different employees who are working in the organization. Motivation is one of the special elements which is required to be taken into consideration as this will help in improving the overall morale of the employees and the entire organization will help in increasing their productivity efficiently as well. In this report, the workplace trend is required to be selected and the implications of the chosen trend for changing nature of employee-employer relationship is required to be discussed. With the implementation of literature on different organizational behavior theories, the entire approach will be discussed.

The workplace trend that has been taken into consideration in the respective report is Flexible Work Arrangements. As per the Workplace Flexibility 2010, this is one of the spectrums of the structure of the work which helps in altering time or place wherein this has been seen that work is getting done on a regular basis. Furthermore, the flexible kind of work arrangements is inclusive of the following:

• There will be flexibility in the scheduling o hours which have been worked by the employees which is inclusive of alternative schedule of work
• Flexibility in the amount of the hours worked which is inclusive of part time work with sharing of job or performing full time work (Wu, Straub & Liang, 2015)
• Flexibility in place of work such as options are available which is inclusive of working at home or at the office

According to Leary and Baumeister (2017), this has been seen and identified that the different workplaces today offer wide range of work arrangements which are flexible in nature and this helps in increasing the motivation among the different individuals working in the organization. Furthermore, Corvellec (2018), has commented that there is flexibility in the place of work which is being performed by the employees in the organization. This has been noticed that there are few organizations which have started introducing work from home options for the employees when there is any kind of issue which is being faced by the employees.

On the other hand, Petrenko et al., (2016), has commented and hypothesised that there is flexibility in the amount of the hours which is being worked by the employees. There are different companies which have introduced the part time or job shares approach in their offices and this helps in managing the different tasks in an appropriate manner.

For example- There are few employees who are studying and working in an organization side by side. This is one of the aspects which is flexible in nature and this helps in introducing flexible shifts for employees which will improve the overall productivity of the organization and employees as well.

 Moreover, job share is the aspect wherein two persons share the duties of one person and they both work on a part time basis. In this respective case, this can be analysed that there is one person who works on Monday/Tuesday and the other employee work on Friday/Wednesday. With the help of these aspects, the employees are being motivated and this helps the employees in becoming successful in completion of the different tasks in the appropriate time (Gunasekaran et al., 2017).

Theories of Motivation and Implications

There are various kinds of implications of flexible working arrangements on the relationships of employer and employees working in the organization (Bakker & Demerouti, 2017). When the organization implements the flexible working environment, this helps in maintaining strong employer and employee relationship which is the key success of the organization which will increase the overall productivity of the organization and efficient in nature. With the help of the different kinds of flexible working schedule, this will improve the overall growth of the organization.

When there are flexible working hours and there is different other flexibility which is included in the tasks performed by the individuals, the FWA which is inclusive of flexibility in timing will help in reducing the workplace conflicts (Valmohammadi & Roshanzamir, 2015). Furthermore, this has been noticed that with implementation of flexibility in the workplace, this will help in attracting the talent and this will help in retaining the valued employees in the organization. With flexibility in workplace, this will improve the communication and bond between employees and employer.

There are different kinds of implications of flexible working arrangements on increasing the motivation among the different individuals. With flexible work schedules, the employees experience various kinds of benefits along with disadvantages as well. The entire analysis is done in the following manner:

• This helps in generating flexibility to meet the different family needs and this helps in avoiding traffic along with stresses of commuting during the rush hours.
• This helps in allowing the individuals to work when they accomplish the goals and enjoy the working environment of the office as well (Shin & Konrad, 2017)
• Furthermore, with the implementation of flexible working hours, this helps the employees in fixing the different other commitments along with activities and make better use of their free time.
• With the implementation of flexible working environment, this will help and ensure that the employees are provided with different opportunities to work from home at time of emergencies and this helps in improving the overall efficiency of the employees in an efficient manner (Petty, 2014).

On the other hand, there are different kinds of disadvantages which can be faced by the employees who are working in the organization in a negative manner. The different cons for the flexible working arrangements are as follows:

• The different employees who thrive in the office environment is difficult for them to work when the other colleagues do not hold the same kind of schedule and this is the main reason for the core working hours which is essential in managing the different tasks in an effective manner (Lazaroiu, 2015)
• Furthermore, the major issue in the concept of work from home is that the different relatives or friends may feel that the person is not working and this can cause problems with relationships (Chen et al., 2014).

These are the major pros and cons of the flexible working arrangements in the organizations. Furthermore, this has been noticed that there are different kinds of issues which are being faced by the different employees which can affect the overall motivation among employees in performing the different kinds of tasks in an ineffective manner.

Motivation is one of the crucial parts in the organization which helps the employees in performing well and this increases the overall productivity of the organization in an appropriate manner as well. Motivation helps in putting human resources in to action which will improve the overall effectiveness of the organization (Para-González, Jiménez-Jiménez & Martínez-Lorente, 2018). This has been noticed that motivational approach among the employees and employer, this helps in improving the level of efficiency of the different employees and this will increase the overall productivity of the organization in an appropriate manner.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Jing & Avery (2016), has commented that motivation helps in building friendly relationship and brings satisfaction among the different employees in the organization. The different kinds of motivational approaches are as follows:

• Non-monetary and monetary incentives
• Opportunities and Promotions for employees
• Disincentives for the different inefficient employees working in organization

Steers & Sánchez?Runde (2017), has hypothesised that in order to build cordial relationship among the different employees in the workplace, this is essential in nature to incorporate co-operation which helps in bringing stability in the organization. Furthermore, the industrial dispute and unrest will be reduced among the employees and this will make the employees adoptable to the different changes which are occurring in the workplace and this will help in gaining competitive advantage in the entire workplace.

Maslow developed the hierarchy of five needs theory in the year 1943 and he postulated the human motivation has acted in order to satisfy the different needs of the different individuals. There are different strengths and weaknesses of the respective theory which is being applied in the organization and this affects the overall motivation among the employees in performing the different kinds of tasks (Birasnav, 2014). The respective theory mainly focuses on the different kinds of needs of the individuals which is inclusive of the self-esteem, physiological, social and security needs of the employees.

Strengths

• Maslow’s theory has natural kind of appeal which can be adopted along with implemented in an uncomplicate kind of technique
• The most unique advantage of the respective theory is that this provides perceptive insight into the entire nature of the human beings (Arora, Arora & Sivakumar, 2016)
• Furthermore, the respective theory has huge relevance towards the different applications of the modern-day activities and this helps in assisting as to interpret the motivation along with the behaviour of the human beings as well
• Lastly, the respective theory helps in providing advantageous summary of the different needs of the human needs which is helpful in planning, positioning and pricing of the products in an effective manner (Abeysekera & Dawson, 2015)

Weaknesses

There are various criticisms for the Maslow’s Hierarchy Theory which has been done by the different researchers and this affects the advantages of the theory. The different weaknesses are as follows:

• The various researchers have commented that there is lack of the hierarchical structure of the different needs as this has been noticed that every individual have their own perception of the needs (Abeysekera & Dawson, 2015)
• The other issue is that there is lack of the direct cause and effect relationship between the behaviour and needs.
• Maslow considered only a narrow segment of the human population and this is difficult for the different researchers to measure the needs as this will generalize them across the human population as well.

Application

There are different kinds of applications of the respective theory as per the organizational behaviour trends which are as follows:

• There is sense of belongingness which is consistent in nature and this helps in motivating the employees in an efficient manner. The ethos of company are of fundamental kind of importance which helps employees in becoming more efficient in performing the different tasks.
• Secondly, the social needs are wherein the employer is required to create opportunity for shared time in social environment such as the employer and employee can have lunch together and this will create huge impact on motivating employees (Abeysekera & Dawson, 2015)
• The self-respect and the status can be enhanced with usage of right techniques of communication and this will help in motivating the employees effectively.
• Applying the principle of the self-fulfilment needs can be developed by the employees with proper development plan which is personal in nature.

With the implementation of the two-factor theory of Herzberg, the different aspects can be analysed and ascertained in an efficient manner. there are different criticisms, strengths along with applications of the respective theory in the workplace which is explained below:

Strengths

• The respective theory mainly focuses on the different kinds of motivation and hygiene aspects which are taken into consideration by the organization
• The different motivational factors help in motivating the different employees and this provides the manager with the insight which will help in improving the personal and professional life of the individuals working in the organization

Weaknesses

• The concept or theory is generalized in nature which may not be appropriate for all the employees who are working in the organization
• The applications of the respective theory is not directly applicable to vast group of the individuals working in the organization and this affects the overall productivity of the organization and employees

Application

There are various applications of the Herzberg’s theory in the workplace which helps in taking care of the different kinds of personal and professional motivational aspects which is required to be taken into consideration in order to generate huge outcome for the company in a positive manner.

The different kinds of applications of the two-factor theory in the different workplaces are as follows:

• The first aspect is that this is seen that the employer takes care of the various needs of the employees working in the organization (Kim, Eisenberger & Baik, 2015)
• Pay an honest salary along with providing guarantee of job to the different employees
• It is required to make sure that the employees do worthwhile work in order to build up the status of the different functions

There are different kinds of recommendations which can be provided for organizational practice which will improve the motivation among the employees in the workplace is being described as follows:

Firstly, this is essential in order to learn and acknowledge the different personal career objectives of the employees which will be helpful in managing the motivational approaches in a positive manner. This is the main duty of the employer of organization to improve the motivational aspects which is being provided to the different employees as this will increase the overall productivity of the organization and employees.

Herzberg’s Two Factor Motivation Theory

It has been seen that most of the employees with great upward mobility are motivated with leadership qualities. With the application of the different motivational theories, this will help in motivating them and this will improve the morale of the employees to gain huge productivity in the organization as well.

Secondly, this is essential in retaining high qualified employees in the organization with the help of the sound practices of management which will improve the overall efficiency of the organization along with employees. After investing a considerable amount of money in recruiting and training employees, this is essential for the higher officials of the company to remain loyal and help them through motivating them with different financial and non-financial rewards.

This step is essential in the organization which will help the company along with the employees in retaining the experienced employees and this can be solved with the help of the strong leadership skills. The different keys to motivating the employees is strong leadership and management practices and skills which will be efficient in nature in managing the different operations in such a manner which will assist in keeping the employees happy and this will improve the productivity of the employees and organization.

Lastly, the affirm the job security is required to be analysed through managerial support in every aspect of the job of the different employees. This is essential in nature for the management along with the employer in providing job security to the employees who are the loyal employees of the organization.

The security related to job plays an essential role in impacting the work ethics of the employees and this will create an atmosphere and culture wherein the individuals p[refer to work as this will improve the overall productivity and competence of the employees and organization in an efficient manner.

Conclusion

Therefore, this can be concluded that employee motivation plays a major role in managing the different employees and gain productivity. Furthermore, this has been seen that there are different theories of motivation such as Maslow’s Hierarchy Theory along with Herzberg’s theory which helped in managing the productivity of the employees and organization in a positive manner and this will improve the overall efficiency of the firm in a positive manner.

References

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.

Arora, A., Arora, A. S., & Sivakumar, K. (2016). Relationships among supply chain strategies, organizational performance, and technological and market turbulences. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(1), 206-232.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273.

Birasnav, M. (2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1622-1629.

Carter, M., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial skills of managers as determinant of organizational performance of small and medium enterprises in Davao region, Philippines.

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., & Chow, W. S. (2014). IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 326-342.

Corvellec, H. (Ed.). (2018). Stories of achievements: Narrative features of organizational performance. Routledge.

Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Wamba, S. F., Childe, S. J., Hazen, B., & Akter, S. (2017). Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 308-317.

Jing, F. F., & Avery, G. C. (2016). Missing links in understanding the relationship between leadership and organizational performance. The International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online), 15(3), 107.

Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R., & Baik, K. (2017). Perceived Organizational Support and Organization Performance: HR, CEO, and Industry Influences. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 14979). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

Lazaroiu, G. (2015). Employee motivation and job performance. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 14, 97.

Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2017). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. In Interpersonal Development (pp. 57-89). Routledge.

Para-González, L., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Martínez-Lorente, A. R. (2018). Exploring the mediating effects between transformational leadership and organizational performance. Employee Relations, 40(2), 412-432.

Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 262-279.

Petty, T. (2014). Motivating first-generation students to academic success and college completion. College Student Journal, 48(1), 133-140.

Shin, D., & Konrad, A. M. (2017). Causality between high-performance work systems and organizational performance. Journal of Management, 43(4), 973-997.

Steers, R. M., & Sánchez?Runde, C. J. (2017). Culture, motivation, and work behavior. The Blackwell Handbook of Cross?Cultural Management, 190-216.

Valmohammadi, C., & Roshanzamir, S. (2015). The guidelines of improvement: Relations among organizational culture, TQM and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 167-178.

Van der Wal, Z. (2015). “All quiet on the non-Western front?” A review of public service motivation scholarship in non-Western contexts. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 69-86.

Wu, S. P. J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T. P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. Mis Quarterly, 39(2), 497-518.