Effects Of Heat On Aggression: Essay Review And Analysis.

Prepare a research paper on the effects of heat on aggression.

Difficulties in the methodologies and inadequacy of the modern statistical analyses made causal statements risks yet causal statements are very important. An example of such is the higher frequency of assaults during the months of summer.  This may be attributed to spurious artefact of the variations in the day-to-day actions that individuals engage in at some point of the year. It may be argued that folks are mostly outside in the seasons of summer and hence enhancing the chances of conflicts (Barton & Ives 2014).

Modern studies have attempted to address such procedural issues in numerous techniques. The study could be classified into three main classes: filed trainings that give attention on just some forms of bellicosity, laboratory trainings that concentrate on bellicosity and laboratory educations which concentrate on variables that are linked to aggression including beliefs, arousal and hostile feelings.

About four summary statements may be used in the characterization of the results. One of such are the periodic claims that noticed that effects of heat result mainly from art factual process, which have been proven to be false (Chester & DeWall 2015). The second one is continuous quest for the situations in which extreme heat may result into a reduction in the bellicosity has tremendously failed (Coccia 2017). The third summary statement has been the ever rising realizations of the other processes that are related to aggression which are at time exaggerate, obscure or alter the effect of heat. The fourth and the final statement is a simplified version of the heat hypothesis which states that people tend to be cranky when they are uncomfortable. This hypothesis has turned out to be very robust. In a nutshell, excessive heat tends to enhance the aggression most of the settings.

Field Research of Aggressive and Heat Behaviour: Field trainings may be grouped conferring to whether they make a comparison of aggression rates, in most cases violent crime rates, across various geographical regions that resemble each other in numerous aspects even though are different in their climate or making a comparison of the aggression rate in a single geographic region but over different time periods in terms of temperature (Craig, Overbeek, Condon & Rinaldo 2016).

With regard to a comparison of geographic regions, the data consistency illustrated that the levels of crime were greater in the south as compared to other areas in the United States. The same patterns were experience in the previous European studies. On the other hand, studies making comparisons of the various time periods established examined the rates of aggression in the hotter against the colder time periods (Fay & Maner 2014). The findings of the study were as well in support of the hypothesis.  

An example is that there were approximately 2.6% more cases of attacks and killings in the US in summer as compared to the other different times of the year. Hot summers generate greater upsurge in violence as opposed to cold summers and the rates of violence are more in the hotter years in comparison to the calmer years even with the application of the various statistical controls (Gailliot 2014). The same results were generated by other studies on time period in which aggression was established to be higher on the warmer seasons and even years.

Field Research of Aggressive and Heat Behaviour

Mixed Results: The laboratory studies on the hypothesis of heath have generate to some extent mixed results. A model, the negative-effect escape model indicates that an increase in the heat enhances the levels of aggression in an individual when the entire amount of the negative impact a person is going through is within the low to adequate level even though the excessive heat lowers the aggression in cases where the total negative effect rises too high. In a nutshell, if the other aspects of the specific situation also generate negative effect, then a further increase in the negative effect resulting from the hot temperature should escalate the escape behaviour as opposed to an aggressive behave (Groves & Anderson 2018). In other words, a hot temperature should generate a reduction in the aggression in cases where there are other factors that produce negative effects.

A meta-analysis, which is an analysis that combined all the findings across all the appropriate studies, generated some significant support for the regular effect of heat in the laboratory settings which had a few extraneous factors that produce negative effect. There was however very slight support for the anticipated drop in the bellicosity in the presence of extraneous negative affects producing factors (Heymes et al., 2014). Most of the early laboratory studies categorically those that adopted ketone heaters suffered the challenge of potential suspicion problems. This means that some of the participants in the studies would have gained suspicion over the real objective of the research and might have hence acted in an unnatural manner.

Laboratory Studies and Variables Related to Aggression: There has been a significant consistency of heat effects on effective, arousal and cognitive variables (McCarthy 2014). An exposure to excessive heat or high temperatures was established to enhance the heat rate, feelings of hostility and acknowledgement of aggressive attitudes which all lower the approaches of comfort and arousal. An increase in the induced heat in the authorisation of bellicose beliefs and attitudes appears more like a perceptive readying effect on the first look which automatically increases the accessibility of aggressive thoughts.

It should be noted however that prime aggressive thoughts are not automatically increased by hot temperatures at least not in a similar way as that of perceiving pictures of guns does (Najafi et al., 2015). For this reason, the impacts of heat on the beliefs and attitude is usually not direct and in several cases likely to be interceded by several direct impacts of heat on the hostile environment. Awkwardly high temperatures will as well generate prejudices in the clarification and analysis of the observed public connections. To be more specific, heat appears to enhance the chances that vague public connections would be inferred as being composed of bellicose components. Lastly, heat stress lowered the performance on numerous cognitive tasks (Nautiyal et al., 2015).

The above three studies have effectively illustrated heat has an effect on the aggression. More categorically, uncomfortably warmer temperatures increase the levels of aggression. The hypothesis of this study therefore is that an increase in the heat effect increases the level of aggression more categorically when it comes to the rates of crimes and assaults.

Laboratory Studies

2326 games were used which were inclusive of all the needed measurements. The games were collected from the openly accessible secondary sources of information from the Armchair Scrutiny website. The website contained data for level of the game for all the games played in the NFL sessions 2000-2011.

The study utilized experimental, quantative, non-blind as well as between subject design. Each game served as the independent variable which was used in the generation of data for the variables that were of interest in the study. The dependent variables include the temperature while humidity was used as control variable (O’Heare & Aggression 2015).

Humidity was included in the study as a control variable since very high humidity tends to be uncomfortable. A thermometer was used in taking the measurements of the temperature while the humidity considered in this study was the relative humidity which defines the amount of water vapour present in the atmosphere at a specific temperature (Parsons 2014).

The scores obtained in visiting and home teams were added together to find the full points score for every games. The penalties among them unnecessary roughness, face masks, taunting and conduct perceived to unsportsmanlike were then coded as aggressive. Any other penalties part from those mentioned were coded to be non-aggressive (Polsky & von Keyserlingk 2017). In addition you the total number of the aggressive and non-aggressive penalties, the measures of the aggressive penalties was taken distinctly for both the visiting teams and home teams. In a bid to justify if the tendencies of the team levels would to a significant extent affect such analyses, a simple ANOVA was used.  

The ANOVA established that was a noteworthy effects of the teams on the visitor bellicose fines (F (31, 3155) =2.141, p<0.001) and on the teams playing at home bellicose (F (31, 3155) =2.044, p<0.001) (Rinderu, Bushman & Van 2018). However through the inclusion of the temperature as the covariate, there was no significance in the collaboration amid the team and the temperature for the visiting teams (F (31, 2723) =873, p=0.668) or for the home team (F (31, 2723) =0.907, p=0.583). This meant that the effects of temperature have no interaction with the specific team preferences. Other possible control variables among them southern culture of honour were not included in the analysis owing to the findings of the substantive prior research which established that certain variable confounded with temperatrure with time as the southern regions of the United States of America tended to be warmer than the other regions of the country (Watkins, DiLillo & Maldonado 2015).

For the overall aggressive penalties used in the study, the total games points as well as the non-aggressive penalties represented a relatively substantial variance (R2=0.037, F (5, 2320) =17.877, p<0.001). There was also a significant correlation between the total game punts, ambient temperature and the aggressive penalties with more penalties even though such was not the case with humidity and spread. Aggressive penalties were significantly predicted by temperature under the control of other variables (, p=0.008) (Watkins, DiLillo & Maldonado 2015).

Methods

There was a significant association between the total games, ambient temperature, non-aggressive penalties and the visitors' non-aggressive fines with the home aggressive penalties. With the control of the other variables, home bellicose fines has a significant prediction of by the temperature (, p=0.004) (Osgood & Muraven 2016). There was a significant association of the full game points, home bellicose fines and non-aggressive penalties with home visitor aggrieve penalties but were not the case with point spread, temperature and humidity. With the control of the other variables, temperature had no significant prediction of the visitor aggression penalties (, p=0.546). An interaction between the repeated measures factor and team illustrated so significant interaction (F (1, 2320) =2.194, p=0.193). The correlation between the aggressive penalties of the home team and the aggressive penalties of the visitor team was (r= (2324) =0.165, p<0.001) (Rinderu, Bushman & Van 2018).

The outcome of the research were in support of the hypothesis of the research. The nature of the results changes in the analysis of the aggressive penalties separately between the visiting teams and the home teams. Such a connection was important for the aggressive fines that were dedicated by the teams at home. Such varied results indicated that the social setting of the study as well had a role to play in the determination if the temperature would enhance aggression (Rinderu, Bushman & Van 2018).

With regard to playing football in the presence of supportive and cheering supporters may collect a sense of in-group support resulting in enhanced actions of bellicosity in the direction of the opponent teams and enables the temperature to have a part in being very bellicose concerning the visiting team. Such a discovery is very relevant in the other domains where intergroup connections occur especially between weaker groups and dominant groups (O’Heare & Aggression 2015). An example is a developmental research taking into consideration the effects of peer group on harassment have been in support of the affiliation of the social groups on bellicosity during the study of adolescent bullying.

The study was not completed without limitations. One of such limitations is that the study suffered a restriction range that is common concern in temperature aggression studies. Following the very high temperatures that are not common and the moderate temperatures that are common, less information for utilization in the study is available (O’Heare & Aggression 2015).

It would be important if further research takes into consideration the other various social contexts which may be deemed relevant to find out if there is a generalization of the results. It would also be helpful to conduct research on the influence of heat on the aggressive actions even under circumstances of high struggle for example warfare, civil clashes and gripes (O’Heare & Aggression 2015).  

References

Barton, B. T., & Ives, A. R. (2014). Direct and indirect effects of warming on aphids, their predators, and ant mutualists. Ecology, 95(6), 1479-1484

Chester, D. S., & DeWall, C. N. (2015). The pleasure of revenge: retaliatory aggression arises from a neural imbalance toward reward. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(7), 1173-1182

Coccia, M. (2017). General causes of violent crime: Homicides, income inequality and the heat hypothesis. Aggression and Violent Behavior

Craig, C., Overbeek, R. W., Condon, M. V., & Rinaldo, S. B. (2016). A relationship between temperature and aggression in NFL football penalties. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 5(2), 205-210

Fay, A. J., & Maner, J. K. (2014). When does heat promote hostility? Person by situation interactions shape the psychological effects of haptic sensations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 210-216

Gailliot, M. T. (2014). An assessment of the relationship between self-control and ambient temperature: A reasonable conclusion is that both heat and cold reduce self-control. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(1), 149-193

Groves, C. L., & Anderson, C. A. (2018). Aversive events and aggression. Current opinion in psychology, 19, 144-148

Heymes, F., Aprina, L., Slangena, P., Lapébieb, E., Osmontb, A., & Dusserrea, G. (2014). On the effects of a triple aggression (fragment, blast, fireball) on an LPG storage. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 36

McCarthy, R. J. (2014). Close replication attempts of the heat priming-hostile perception effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 165-169

Najafi, P., Zulkifli, I., Jajuli, N. A., Farjam, A. S., Ramiah, S. K., Amir, A. A., ... & Eckersall, D. (2015). Environmental temperature and stocking density effects on acute phase proteins, heat shock protein 70, circulating corticosterone and performance in broiler chickens. International journal of biometeorology, 59(11), 1577-1583

Nautiyal, K. M., Tanaka, K. F., Barr, M. M., Tritschler, L., Le Dantec, Y., David, D. J., ... & Ahmari, S. E. (2015). Distinct circuits underlie the effects of 5-HT1B receptors on aggression and impulsivity. Neuron, 86(3), 813-826

O’Heare, J., & Aggression, I. (2015). The effects of spaying and neutering on canine behavior

Osgood, J. M., & Muraven, M. (2016). Does counting to ten increase or decrease aggression? The role of state self?control (ego?depletion) and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(2), 105-113

Parsons, K. (2014). Human thermal environments: the effects of hot, moderate, and cold environments on human health, comfort, and performance. CRC press

Polsky, L., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. (2017). Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. Journal of dairy science, 100(11), 8645-8657

Rinderu, M. I., Bushman, B. J., & Van Lange, P. A. (2018). Climate, aggression, and violence (CLASH): a cultural-evolutionary approach. Current opinion in psychology, 19, 113-118

Watkins, L. E., DiLillo, D., & Maldonado, R. C. (2015). The interactive effects of emotion regulation and alcohol intoxication on lab-based intimate partner aggression. Psychology of addictive behaviors, 29(3), 653